On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --]
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:50:35PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: >> * Changes must not only tested for compilation success but also for correct >> output. > I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually inspect the > output of all of the exports. There is no need to test *all* exports, just the default (i.e. pdf2) and only for changes that may change the output. >> That said, I am not against the proposed changes (but Uwe is the one to >> decide). > Because of what I said above, I think you would be against the proposed > changes. Correct? > Perhaps there is some automatic way to do it, using a tool that looks > for diffs in PDFs. diffpdf is useful, for example. If you understand the consequences of a change, manual testing may be confined to one (or none for simple changes) document (not all translations, say). Günter
