On 2016-10-14, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:36:11PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: >> For the end-user the difference is: >> * with "no", there is a safeguard against relying on additional packages >> without real need -> less dependencies when compiling the docs. > Wouldn't this be a LyX bug if we rely on an unneededed depencency? To be > clear, I believe Jean-Pierre and I were on the same page of porposing > that the options be changed to "Load automatically". We are not > proposing "Load always". Not a LyX bug. With "safeguard", I only mean the feadback by the compilation error if the editor/maintainer uses a feature requiring an additional package. If we decide now to allow this, we should set the options to "auto". I agree that this is a (small) benefit for the documentation people with a negligible impact on the average user. I.e. I am in favour of setting the math-package settings to "auto". Günter
