On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 10:59:18AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:39:39PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Enrico> wrote: > >> I think this cygwin-without-cygwin stuff is becoming stranger and > >> stranger. > > Enrico> cygwin-without-cygwin? what's that? ;-) > > Isn't the point of this thread to support compiling with cygwin > -mnocygwin and (perhaps separately, I am not sure anymore) to have a > binary that can either be cygwin-based or not depending on the phase > of the moon? It may be that I missed the point, but I think we should > keep things simple.
No, you got it wrong. This for the real cygwin target. > The interesting part, of course, is proper support for real cygwin, > which you address in your other message. I always had addressed real cygwin. I have never spoken of problems related to build a native LyX with cygwin (cygwin-without-cygwin). In some other thread I mentioned it only to say that building it that way I see no problems related with gettext/libiconv as opposed to what seems to happen using mingw. -- Enrico
