Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
| > autotools. Huge difference.
|
| Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
| challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons will evolve to
| a state that can replace autotools without doubt, but it is not easy
| to prove it *now*, given its 0.96.xx status.
|
| Currently, autotools work on windows, cygwin, solaris and every linux
| variant under the sun so a replacement is not needed. As long as
| package packers can live with autotools, I have no intention to change
| the current status.
Ok, nail in the coffin then. Retire all scons stuff to the
development dir, just as was done with the vcproj stuff.
Come on guys, keep cool. Lars just agreed for Scons presence in trunk...
IMHO there's better things in life than to fight for these little matters.
Abdel.
