Ah, I see. Which I dont have. Clearly I should get one. What is an example of one that is worth owning? I recall having one that was useless so I gave up on usb serial.
On Sunday, April 26, 2020, Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com> wrote: > Standard pc ports dont support 76800 do they? > > On Sunday, April 26, 2020, Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I know that Ken, Nothing else can though? >> >> >> On Sunday, April 26, 2020, Ken Pettit <petti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Steve, >>> >>> M100 can run at 76800 on it's UART. >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> On 4/26/20 2:39 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >>> >>> John what are you connecting to at 76800? I dont think I have anything >>> other than an m100. >>> >>> >>> On Sunday, April 26, 2020, John R. Hogerhuis <jho...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 7:25 PM Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Still playing around with the BCR TTL serial port. >>>>> ...yes it has it's limitations... half duplex, no flow control, >>>>> bit-banged >>>>> >>>>> ..but it is fast! Today I was able to get 32kB transferred in 7 >>>>> seconds. That's pretty close to 100% utilization on the 57600 baud line. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Very cool :-) >>>> >>>> >>>>> I think that is a new M100 record. It might need independent >>>>> verification! >>>>> >>>> >>>> Close! >>>> >>>> I just measured TBACK.EXE at 76800bps dumps all 32K to a PC in >>>> 6.56seconds. >>>> >>>> > .\TBACK.EXE -b -f COM9 ABACK.CB >>>> >>>> At 19200 it's like 9 seconds. >>>> >>>> :-) >>>> >>>> TBACK.EXE has you RUN"COM:98N1E" and it injects a small program that >>>> bootstraps up to 76800bps and then blasts the data out the port. >>>> >>>> -- John. >>>> >>> >>>
