I don't think the colors are "richer" just brighter. It's incredibl bright. I have a vga monitor attached and now, in comparison it is considerably dimmer. I didn't notice it as much with my former computer.
And Jerry, you are way kewl!!!! Thursday, July 19, 20076:57 PMJerry Freemanx12 at insightbb.com > >On Jul 19, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Harry Jacobson-Beyer wrote: > >> If by rendering you mean how do the photos look - very bright. > >i looked at the LED macbook pro at compusa under florescent lighting, >and i could not see a discernible difference. yes it was brighter, >but that is not necessarily a good thing for properly editing photos. > >i was more interested in your 'personal' impression of how it >displays (renders) color, ie is the color 'noticeably' richer to >'you'? it wasn't richer to me, but i work on a 20" cinema display. > >how an image behaves within an application, redraws etc., is a >function of the video card which are generally adequate. > >why i ask, is that i'm in need of a laptop and the macbook satisfies >my meager requirements. i am supposing that the LED monitor will >filter down to the macbook in the next product cycle. battery life is >not a concern, and it's not apparent to me that there is any >compelling reason to wait. > >and of course, i will never be kewl. best...jf > > > >_______________________________________________ >The next Louisville Computer Society meeting will >be July 24 at MacAuthority, 128 Breckinridge Lane. >Posting address: MacGroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu >Information: http://www.math.louisville.edu/mailman/listinfo/macgroup
