At 6:35 PM -0600 3/17/02, Puneet Kishor wrote:
>I guess it is a matter of getting used to one way of doing things
>versus another. I actually find it very easy if everything goes
>through the one bottleneck of index.???. Esp. useful if I am
>building in extensive error-trapping on an application level, or if
>I want to change the look and feel of the application globally. One
>downside is that the URLs are cryptic (actually not so, since every
>call has a hint to what is going to be done via the index file, for
>eg, index.pl?do=getrecords or index.pl?do=insertrecords, etc.), but
>mnemonic URLs are not important in an application anyway.
Have a look at autohandlers and dhandlers in Mason. I think a
top-level autohandler is probably what you want to take the place of
your index.pl.
--
Ray Zimmerman / e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 428-B Phillips Hall
Sr Research / phone: (607) 255-9645 / Cornell University
Associate / FAX: (815) 377-3932 / Ithaca, NY 14853
