On 2005.6.25, at 08:35 AM, Ted Zeng wrote:

My problem is it provides much more than I need.

Are your sure?

I just need to log in to another Mac to execute
commands there. I don't care securities, or anything.
rlogin is good enough for me.

Well, there is a company taking contracts from the credit card companies that "just needed some real world data to test something with" and "wasn't going to have that data where it could be accessed improperly". And how many hundreds of thousands of credit card numbers worldwide have been stolen?

I don't want to copy a public key over to that machine ( I don't have to
in Panther. But have to in Tiger)

This doesn't really make sense. Are you sure that you didn't connect by hand in pather once, and answer the query about whether you would accept the certificate or not? Once the certificate was accepted, perl in Panther might have been accessing the user's .ssh?

Are there any environment files that didn't get transferred or rebuilt, or, if you just upgraded, were there some settings files that got erased?

 before I could talk to that machine.
This is a nightmare to me.

Eventually, this kind of thing will get straightened out a bit. But we who write programs still need to be aware of when we need to identify and when we need to encrypt and when we can just spit data. (If we don't, who will?)

--
Joel Rees

msn.com and hotmail.com users take note --
Microsoft wants to refuse my mail if I don't use SenderID starting November.
SenderID was refused as an internet standard and does not stop SPAM,
and it contains a Microsoft patented algorithm.
Draw your own conclusions.

Reply via email to