Oh wow, you're right. I guess I should have checked. I guess I made
some faulty assumptions of how portindex worked.
That said, I don't think it *should* list universal unless the port
is actually known to work with it. Any proposed solutions?
On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
Incidentally, ports will not actually list +universal as a
supported variant, since PortIndex won't see it.
Actually, they do:
% port info apr | grep universal
apr 1.2.8, devel/apr (Variants: universal, darwin_9)
% port cat apr | grep universal
--
Kevin Ballard
http://kevin.sb.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tildesoft.com
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
