On Feb 27, 2007, at 13:49, Kevin Ballard wrote:

That said, I don't think it *should* list universal unless the port is actually known to work with it. Any proposed solutions?

I don't think anything needs to be done. I don't have any problem with the +universal variant being listed even if it doesn't work. If someone tries it and it does not work, then they should submit a bug report to the maintainer, just as they would for any other problem with the port. Then the maintainer will either fix it or add a universal variant which just outputs a us_msg explaining that a universal build is not available at this time. Problem solved.


_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to