On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:52 AM, René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday February 10 2015 09:37:53 Brandon Allbery wrote: > >I think someone did have this (try to) happen to them recently-ish. I also > > I don't recall having seen this recently-ish issue discussed on a ML - or > it was about a port that I found no interest in. > It was mentioned in IRC. Not all MacPorts discussion happens on mailing lists. > >> I take it there is no official way to define the permissions mask for a > >> macports user that would allow an admin user full control over content > >> owned by the macports user (but not the reverse)? > > > >Not sure you can make extended ACLs propagate the right way. > > IIRC you'd have to use umask() somewhere in a tcl extension, and then also > unpack source I'd be trying to use ACLs for this, not rely on solely traditional Unix permissions. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
