I didn't say that either. What I said was that all bugs get prioritized. That means that necessarily some of our bugs will be lower down the list than some other bugs. Similarly, some other bugs will be lower down on the list than some of ours. We can't always get top billing, and it's unrealistic for us to expect that.
-- Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA Phone: 814-860-3194 Mobile: 814-431-0962 Email: bu...@brannan.name > On Oct 20, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Robin <robin-mel...@comcast.net> wrote: > > I'm sorry for your misinterpretation of what I said. > I never inferred and/or said that you didn't request "bug' and/or "flaw" > fixes. I said you inferred that with mainstream access (accessibility), other > issues take presidence over our issues, and I regretfully disagree since > these MobileDevices are being incorporated into Public Education for both > mainstream and/or specialty segments of the disabled population. > If we were only referring to personal use, you might have a"Leg" to "Stand" > on, but I would also disagree with you there as well. I'm not going to "sit > back" and "wait" for someone to give me what I want, I'm going to ask for it > until I get it. Of course, there are instances whre this doesn't apply. Just > saying. > > At 05:03 AM 10/20/2014, you wrote: >> And this just proves people will hear exactly what they want to hear. >> Nowhere did I say that we shouldn't ask for fixes, point out problelms that >> need fixed, or anything of the sort. Trust the system? Who ever said that? >> Not me. >> >> -- >> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA >> Phone: 814-860-3194 >> Mobile: 814-431-0962 >> Email: bu...@brannan.name >> >> >> >> > On Oct 19, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Robin <robin-mel...@comcast.net> wrote: >> > >> > In my humble opinion, I don't agree with your assessment as it pertains to >> > mainstream accessibility (Out of the Box). If these mainstream products >> > are going to be incorporated into Public Education settings, and people >> > with disabilities are going to be mainstreamed, how can Apple products be >> > recommended if said population can't perform the same task as their >> > Sighted (Ol'Sighty) counterparts. >> > >> > Apple products are currently incorporated in Special Education areas such >> > as AAC and VIto mention a few. >> > >> > >> > If these products were exclusively and/or solely going to be used for >> > personal use, you might have a point, but that's not the case. >> > >> > Have you ever heard the saying, "A closed mouth doesn't get fed" or how >> > about "Trust the system" or "Wait your Turn", I could go on and on >> > (Has your Co-Host, Alena of TripleClickHome recommended any Apple products >> > for her VI Students? What about your friend, Allison of the >> > TechDoctorPodcast?) >> > >> > At 04:33 PM 10/19/2014, you wrote: >> >> See, here's the thing. We *are* being treated like everyone else. Now >> >> that we have mainstream access to mainstream products, that also means >> >> that our bugs get stuck in the queue with everyone else's bugs. They get >> >> prioritized along with everybody else's bugs. And they get fixed in the >> >> schedule with everybody else's bugs. The tradeoff we get for out of the >> >> box accessibility from a mainstream manufacturer is that we don't get >> >> special releases or fixes specific to our needs. We get them on the same >> >> schedule as everyone else's bugs. Sometimes we may not like the priority >> >> our requests get, but it's the price we pay for getting exactly what >> >> we've asked for for years. >> >> >> >> Change is inevitable. iTunes has changed. I'm not a huge fan of the >> >> change either, but there it is, and I can still use it, even if I like it >> >> less. My like or dislike of it, however, doesn't have any bearing on >> >> whether or not it's accessible. Same with Yosemite in general; it's >> >> changed. I haven't really had any real problems with it, generally >> >> speaking. I mostly like the changes, apart of course for iTunes 12. But >> >> I'm definitely not seeing significant accessibility impacts on what I do >> >> with OS X from day to day. >> >> >> >> Yep. Early betas were pretty awful. Early betas for iOS8 were also >> >> horribly broken. But that's why they're betas. I've told people who have >> >> asked me whether iOS8 is worth having, I've told them that I have a >> >> pretty skewed view on that, since by comparison to the early betas, it's >> >> really good, so I have no significant complaints. Well...I have to say, >> >> I've recently had occasion to look at iTunes Radio, and notice that it >> >> doesn't really read the way they're supposed to. I expect it will get >> >> fixed in due course, but, again, on Apple's schedule, along with >> >> everybody else's bugs, in the queue, in its order, in priority with >> >> everybody else's bugs. Because seriously, if you think that we're the >> >> only ones dealing with bugs, sometimes really inconvenient bugs, you're >> >> at best naive, at worst delusional. >> >> >> >> Anyway, yes. We have gotten exactly what we've been asking for. That >> >> sometimes means unpleasant side effects. Myself, I'm happy to take the >> >> unpleasant side effects as a part of the whole package. Does this make me >> >> an Apple apologist? Does this mean that I'm willing to settle for the >> >> crumbs from the table, as it were, and am content with my lot as a >> >> second-class citizen? far from it. It means I recognize that my problems >> >> are a subset of all the problems that Apple is dealing with to make >> >> things work, sometimes in the face of pretty significant change. >> >> >> >> Absolutely send notes to the accessibility team. But if you do, be >> >> specific. If you can't be specific, don't bother, because no one can fix >> >> bugs without specific ways to reproduce them. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA >> >> Phone: 814-860-3194 >> >> Mobile: 814-431-0962 >> >> Email: bu...@brannan.name >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 19, 2014, at 7:09 PM, Pamela Francis <gypsykitt...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > In the answer to a couple of your questions, ask for a company making >> >> > their products usable by the disabled, do you or do you not remember >> >> > what sharp did for us with talking clocks and calculators? Do you also >> >> > know that Panasonic makes optional talking caller ID in its cordless >> >> > phones? For years swans foods offered all of their catalogs in braille >> >> > along with their cooking directions as one could also read on their >> >> > boxes. It is not unreasonable or pompous to expect to be treated the >> >> > same as anyone else in the same store paying the same money for the >> >> > same product. If you consider that pompous, you must be living with >> >> > your parents who do everything for you. I do not. I've lived away from >> >> > my family since 1974, then married, raise two children and have four >> >> > grandchildren. I've been through the times where we didn't as much as >> >> > have digital readings on elevators or braille on hotel room doors. I >> >> > travel anywhere I want to go, do anything I want to do. I do not expect >> >> > special treatment. I ask for what I need. >> >> > >> >> > Pam Francis >> >> > >> >> > On Oct 19, 2014, at 5:10 PM, The Believer <ancient.ali...@icloud.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > That is a first. The general public now dictates what the disabled >> >> > public gets? Apple develops products for the mainstream market...and >> >> > they also have enabled these same products to be usable by the >> >> > disabled. Can amy other comppany claim that? >> >> > >> >> > We all can walk into any Apple store along with the sighted general >> >> > public and buy the same products they do and use the same products >> >> > alongside them. >> >> > >> >> > And if we have an issue with our product, we can walk into any Apple >> >> > store or cal their toll free number and get the same assistance. >> >> > >> >> > Why should we expect any different treatment? Because we are blind? >> >> > That, IMO, is shortsightedness and perhaps even pompous. It certainly >> >> > will not get one very far. >> >> > >> >> > No one is glossing over anything. On the other hand, some are over the >> >> > top downright unreasonable. >> >> > >> >> > From The Believer. . . >> >> > . . . what if it were true? >> >> > ancient.ali...@icloud.com >> >> > >> >> >> On 10/19/2014 2:02 PM, Pamela Francis wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> I'm normally not one to complain for the sake of complaining. I am a >> >> >> realist. I know that we as a market are a minority within Apple's >> >> >> customer base. I will give them credit where it's due. They did take >> >> >> the lead in accessibility. However, mainstream society has caught on >> >> >> to the fact that Apple products are accessible to blind people. That >> >> >> in itself is a double edge sword. None of us want to be put into a >> >> >> corner and told what is good for us by our cited peers. we want >> >> >> general society to except what we can use on its own merit showing >> >> >> them we can use products that they can use. there are still those who >> >> >> think that Apple products are simply all we can use. It's an all or >> >> >> nothing statement within the cited community as much as it is within >> >> >> our community. If that same statement is made with an aside a >> >> >> community, no one gripes. However if we say anything, we're >> >> >> complaining. Apple has become aware of what the cited community >> >> >> believes it's capable of doing for us, therefore they have >> >> > become lackadaisical forcing us to settle for whatever they throw at >> >> > us, as it has been within Windows another third-party screen readers. >> >> > If I go in to the grocery store and purchase what is supposed to be a >> >> > complete packaged product, get it home find out it isn't, take it back >> >> > to the store; am I complaining because I can't see? I don't think so. >> >> >> What I'm getting at by this rant is if there is a given feature >> >> >> supported by a given manufacturer that is designed for us or any other >> >> >> accessibility community, it should be fully featured and attended to >> >> >> with the same fervor as is done for the majority of its customer base. >> >> >> The fact that they maintain an accessibility line within itself on its >> >> >> face is a good thing. However, if those people truly have no say as to >> >> >> how things are done, are they there only for lipservice? I'm not >> >> >> willing to walk into a store, pay the same price for a product that my >> >> >> cited peers do and not have a right to complain about its >> >> >> functionality whether it's for me or for my cited peers. We as a blind >> >> >> community for too many years have been told we had to settle for >> >> >> second place. In many cases prior to the Internet we didn't have a >> >> >> means to communicate with people are issues, therefore we were forced >> >> >> to settle. That is no longer the case. To those who choose to regale >> >> >> the things that Apple does without being w >> >> > illing to admit apples faults, you are hurting all of us. Take that for >> >> > what it's worth. >> >> >> >> >> >> Pam Francis >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 19, 2014, at 2:23 PM, The Believer <ancient.ali...@icloud.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I did not have a disastrous experience. I had just gotten a new >> >> >> Macbook with Mountain Lion and Mavericks came out shortly after that. >> >> >> And history repeats itself today with Yosemite. >> >> >> >> >> >> There were many complaints about Mavericks. Meanwhile, I worked with >> >> >> ML, trying to forget Windows. Finally I upgraded to Mavericks about a >> >> >> month ago! (smiles) >> >> >> >> >> >> I am still learning to use the Mac but it may not take me as long to >> >> >> move to Yosemite. Maybe a month? I will install iOS 8 at the same time >> >> >> but not intil both are better behaved. >> >> >> >> >> >> From The Believer. . . >> >> >> . . . what if it were true? >> >> >> ancient.ali...@icloud.com >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 10/19/2014 12:15 PM, Christine Grassman wrote: >> >> >>> I agree. While I would stop short of placing Apple on a pedestal, as >> >> >>> no one or company is worthy of that level of responsibility, I am >> >> >>> realistic about the varying preferences and needs of a customer base >> >> >>> consisting of millions of people, and I am steadfastly grateful for >> >> >>> Apple and its integral part in allowing me to complete the essential >> >> >>> tasks of my job and to enjoy much of what my sighted peers enjoy on a >> >> >>> reasonably equitable playing field out of the box. >> >> >>> I intend to write to Apple as someone who continues to appreciate its >> >> >>> devices and software a great deal, and urge it not to forget little >> >> >>> me and those like me. >> >> >>> I think any "absolutist" or all-or-nothing statements do no good. >> >> >>> I decided after a disastrous experience with Mavericks when it was >> >> >>> first released that I would never again update immediately after a >> >> >>> first release. I am anxious to avail myself of continuity, hand off, >> >> >>> iBooks, and answering calls on my MacBook, but I can wait. I know >> >> >>> for a fact that a VoiceOver lag will bother me in the extreme, and >> >> >>> the very first thing I did was read Applevis's article on the bugs, >> >> >>> even though I had no intention of updating right away. I am >> >> >>> currently content, and I await Yosemite's evolution. >> >> >>> Christine >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups "MacVisionaries" group. >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> >> > an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups "MacVisionaries" group. >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> >> > an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> >> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "MacVisionaries" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
