On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:20 +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Antonio Aloisio > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I propose you all, to choose a standard version name for us maemo packages. > > It's such a good idea, it's already been done! :-) > > See section 3.1 of the Maemo Packaging Policy: > > https://maemo.org/forrest-images/pdf/maemo-policy.pdf > > My understanding[1] of this is: > > * Any package patched, or not from a existing deb source, needs to > have a maemo version suffix.
So every single package in extras should have a maemo suffix? > * For example, if the base version is 7.0, the package version from > should be 7.0-0maemo1 for the first upload, 7.0-0maemo2 for the > second, etc. > * If the upstream package comes from Debian (with version 3.5-7) > and is unpatched, > the package uploaded from is also 3.5-7. > * If the upstream package comes from Debian (with version 3.5-7) > and is patched, > the package uploaded from mud is 3.5-7maemo1 for the first upload, > 3.5-7maemo2 for the second, etc. > > Hope that helps, > > Andrew > > [1] http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Jaffa/mud_design#Requirements -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
