it will have to be on IOU i have no job, no money, no anything. im actually surprised mrs lcuk let me go at all
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Aniello Del Sorbo <ani...@gmail.com>wrote: > Apologies will be accepted in Amsterdam along with a bottle of beer :D > > 2009/9/24 gary liquid <liq...@gmail.com>: > > please accept huge apologies for spelling of your name Aniello :$ > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, gary liquid <liq...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> :) > >> > >> this has been a good informative discussion. > >> since we are working on beta, can i suggest something. > >> > >> anidels point about app feedback *from the device itself* is important. > >> > >> if me as a user selects extras testing and installs a an app because > >> anidel said his new version is there > >> from that moment on, it should be the device itself that monitors the > >> process. > >> > >> in the same way the crash reporter pops up and asks a question after a > >> crash, can we discuss a path to similar for testing apps? > >> perhaps if the app itself in testing had a flag added to its desktop > file > >> (or some other way, a list perhaps *hand waving*) > >> and when the user has run the app they are testing, or 1/2/12/24 hours > >> after installing the user was directly asked > >> > >> "what are your feelings on this app?" > >> > >> it would give control directly to the testers and remove the disconnect > >> that currently occurs - I for one have major problems maintaining a big > long > >> list of places and sites and things I should look for and the packages > list > >> overwhelms me with multiple versions and complex filenames which mean > >> nothing to me as a user. > >> the app is installed on my tablet, it is a computer, it knows the > version, > >> it knows the url path - i can give valuable feedback there and then. > >> > >> i dont know how practical or complex an app of this nature would be, but > >> we have enough toolkits and developers around who might help code > something > >> up. > >> it should even go through extras-testing itself! > >> > >> gary > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Aniello Del Sorbo <ani...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> 2009/9/24 Andre Klapper <aklap...@openismus.com>: > >>> > Am Donnerstag, den 24.09.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Aniello Del Sorbo: > >>> >> My only complaint is on who has the final word. > >>> > > >>> > Again: It is the package maintainer, after his/her package has been > >>> > given 10 karma points by testers. > >>> > > >>> > andre > >>> > -- > >>> > Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) > >>> > > >>> > >>> Thus I guess we need to work on what those testers should work. > >>> Is this being done? > >>> > >>> And what about the second part of the proposal? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> anidel > >>> Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> maemo-developers mailing list > >>> maemo-developers@maemo.org > >>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > anidel >
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
