I will bring the two bottles of beer and you will bring your free apologies. ;)
Aniello 2009/9/24 gary liquid <liq...@gmail.com>: > it will have to be on IOU > i have no job, no money, no anything. > im actually surprised mrs lcuk let me go at all > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Aniello Del Sorbo <ani...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Apologies will be accepted in Amsterdam along with a bottle of beer :D >> >> 2009/9/24 gary liquid <liq...@gmail.com>: >> > please accept huge apologies for spelling of your name Aniello :$ >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, gary liquid <liq...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> :) >> >> >> >> this has been a good informative discussion. >> >> since we are working on beta, can i suggest something. >> >> >> >> anidels point about app feedback *from the device itself* is important. >> >> >> >> if me as a user selects extras testing and installs a an app because >> >> anidel said his new version is there >> >> from that moment on, it should be the device itself that monitors the >> >> process. >> >> >> >> in the same way the crash reporter pops up and asks a question after a >> >> crash, can we discuss a path to similar for testing apps? >> >> perhaps if the app itself in testing had a flag added to its desktop >> >> file >> >> (or some other way, a list perhaps *hand waving*) >> >> and when the user has run the app they are testing, or 1/2/12/24 hours >> >> after installing the user was directly asked >> >> >> >> "what are your feelings on this app?" >> >> >> >> it would give control directly to the testers and remove the disconnect >> >> that currently occurs - I for one have major problems maintaining a big >> >> long >> >> list of places and sites and things I should look for and the packages >> >> list >> >> overwhelms me with multiple versions and complex filenames which mean >> >> nothing to me as a user. >> >> the app is installed on my tablet, it is a computer, it knows the >> >> version, >> >> it knows the url path - i can give valuable feedback there and then. >> >> >> >> i dont know how practical or complex an app of this nature would be, >> >> but >> >> we have enough toolkits and developers around who might help code >> >> something >> >> up. >> >> it should even go through extras-testing itself! >> >> >> >> gary >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Aniello Del Sorbo <ani...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> 2009/9/24 Andre Klapper <aklap...@openismus.com>: >> >>> > Am Donnerstag, den 24.09.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Aniello Del >> >>> > Sorbo: >> >>> >> My only complaint is on who has the final word. >> >>> > >> >>> > Again: It is the package maintainer, after his/her package has been >> >>> > given 10 karma points by testers. >> >>> > >> >>> > andre >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> Thus I guess we need to work on what those testers should work. >> >>> Is this being done? >> >>> >> >>> And what about the second part of the proposal? >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> anidel >> >>> Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> maemo-developers mailing list >> >>> maemo-developers@maemo.org >> >>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> anidel > > -- -- anidel Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
