On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 11:56, Brad Knowles wrote: > I think JC was talking about the broader subject, more than just > the standard DSNs. > > I agree with you that we could do a better job of parsing and > handling the standard DSNs, but I agree with JC that this is a very > tough task to do beyond the standard DSNs.
Mailman /should/ be able to parse RFC 3464 DSNs accurately, at the very least to tell whether the notification indicates a permanent failure or not. If it's not working right, it's a bug. All the 'magical' bounce detection stuff in the other Mailman/Bouncers modules is a losing battle, and I don't have much motivation to keep up with the arms race. DSN and VERP should be all we need. -Barry _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
