On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 13:42, Paul Tomblin wrote: > The code is already a nest of special cases. It won't hurt the pristine > nature of the perfect code to add a small check and NOT mishandle one > thing that is erroneously treated as a bounce. Especially since it > appears that somebody already added something to the API to allow warnings > to be silently ignored.
Actually, it may, so if you decide to code it up (and it /definitely/ ain't gonna happen if you don't), you need to be careful. If your change catches something or reports a false-positive or false-negative, it could cause other bounce processors to miss the message. I wish the bounce processors had a better test suite, but you can (and should) add your additions to tests/test_bounces.py and make sure everything there still passes. -Barry _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
