>*** Shouldn't spam traps reject all mails after the END-OF-DATA? *** If they did, they would be easily identifiable, and thus would have no value. The thing with spamtraps is that they should not be in your DB in the first place (especially pristine ones) or should have been trimmed from your DB a long time ago (back when they went from a usable user address to a bouncing address before being reactivated as a spamtrap).
-----Message d'origine----- De : mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] De la part de Ralf Hildebrandt via mailop Envoyé : jeudi 22 août 2019 09:45 À : mailop@mailop.org Objet : Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: Return Path / Sender Score * Michael Wise via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>: > > > Sometimes ... pristine ... isn't. Thought so. > Presuppose y'all are doing bounce processing? Yes. This raises a question regaring spam traps: *** Shouldn't spam traps reject all mails after the END-OF-DATA? *** 1) That way the spam trap addresses would eventually be removed by bounce processing 2) At the same time the content of the email could be examined by the spam trap operator. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin ralf.hildebra...@charite.de Campus Benjamin Franklin https://www.charite.de Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin Geschäftsbereich IT, Abt. Netzwerk fon: +49-30-450.570.155 _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
