Dnia 19.04.2022 o godz. 11:17:54 Scott Mutter via mailop pisze: > > I'm a little surprised people are this upset. Google's using SPF for what > it's actually meant for - and yet people are upset because they are doing > that?
No. "Using SPF for what it's actually meant for" would be honoring what the domain owner has decided, not attempting "to know better". If domain has a SPF record, it should be enforced. If it doesn't, SPF check should be ignored. There is no RFC that says you MUST have a SPF record. -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa r...@rafa.eu.org -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
