Heho, dmarcv1 is a typo in the description (i correctly check for DMARC1, otherwise this would have shown up earlier);
The actual complaint is psd=n; Lemme see if i can make the report more clear re: where it complained. Do you maybe have some context on psd=n? I can't find it in 7489. With best regards, Tobias On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 17:32 -0500, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Tobias Fiebig via mailop <tob...@fiebig.nl> said: > > Heho, > > > > after our paper on mail sending configurations some time ago [1], > > we > > now glued that together into a self-service site: > > > > https://email-security-scans.org/ > > > > I'd be happy to hear your feedback, especially if things do not > > work as > > expected (then, your test ID and ideally stored emails would be > > really > > helpful, > > It's complaining that my DMARC record is invalid because it doesn't > start with "v=DKIMv1". What? > > Test ID ttada96061gfwnvbuthbycansr5h34 > > R's, > John -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M tob...@fiebig.nl _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
