I've used printing into pdf for quite some time now - and can only recommend
it. However you have to select 600 dpi as your default resolution - it looks
publication quality. Use only proper paper for your deskjet/plotter - it does
make a difference. The resulting output looks much better from Acrobat than
printing directly from MI, especially text - fonts are somewhat rounder, less
affected by "rastering" effects.
Milo
Declan Troy wrote:
> Mappers,
>
> Anyone with positive comments about printing layouts (map windows) to pdf
> files using Acrobat. Do the pdf files look pretty true to the originals?
> Does printed output of the pdf file compare well with printing direct from
> MapInfo? I've yet to try it but it seems that combining pdf files might be
> a good way to get map illustrations into reports with reasonable quality
> (better than saving windows as files) if the map pdfs retain printer
> quality.
>
> Declan
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
> "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
