Comrade f580,
 
You are most correct here on several points.  One, it is a complete waste of 
time and energy to argue with Melvin because, secondly, he completely distorts 
what is said with the intent to misconstrue things.
 
Firstly, I said it was the extermination of a class which is absolutely true.  
The dictatorship of the proletariat completely subdues the former ruling-class 
and as a class they are exterminated as they are eradicated and abolished as a 
class.  When this class is completely abolished there is no more class 
struggle, hence, the ability of the socialist State to wither away and 
communism is fully realized.  I never said anything about the "extermination of 
individuals of a class" as Melvin claims.  The more he tries to refute the 
essence of the class struggle the more he embelishes what has been said.  This 
is no accident as it is a most definite pattern in his strategy of discourse.
 
Secondly, my point about slavery not being THE issue is still valid and I 
refuse to recant it.  My comment was made in reference to Lincoln's position on 
slavery vs the preservation of the Union.  Slavery was not THE issue, in other 
words, it was not the only issue and this is evidenced in that it took almost 2 
years for Lincoln to move the question of slavery to the forefront.  Until that 
time he cared less about whether slavery was eradicated or not and that is 
historically documented and undeniable.  Lincoln's position prior to making 
slavery the forefront issue was racist and supported by historical 
documentation which also is evidenced through historical documentation that he 
favored "colonization" of the slaves in another country altogether because he 
refused to accept the equality of blacks with whites.  There is no denying this 
and there were many other issues or contradictions that were at play as well 
that he and every other revisionist
 historian refuses to address or downplays.  It is because of the historical 
records and documentation that anyone can access that fully proves slavery, in 
Lincoln's mind and that of most of the Northerners who enacted Black Codes, did 
not make slavery THE SINGULAR ISSUE.
 
Even when Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation historical records show 
that he did so as a "war measure" and not because of an overwhelming moral 
conviction.
 
I recant nothing in either of the 2 subject matters.  Melvin is a 
self-righteous egotist that will see only what he wants to see, therefore, he 
intentionally distorts and twists everything and takes them out of context in 
order for him to puff up his chest in a false sense of obtaining some kind of 
moral high ground.  
 
Yes, it is a waste of time arguing with someone of this character because they 
never will portray the truth but only contort to serve their own opportunistic 
agenda.  This has been his method ever since joining this list and I therefore 
have no use for this opportunist.
 
Fraternally
 
Mark Scott

--- On Thu, 12/23/10, frankenstein580 <frankied...@yahoo.com> wrote:


From: frankenstein580 <frankied...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [MLL] I denounce the statement below advocating . . . . .
To: "For the reaffirmation of Marxism-Leninism" 
<marxist-leninist-list@lists.econ.utah.edu>
Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010, 3:43 AM



WL:

"You state it is I and the intelligence agencies of the bourgeoisie,  
specifically the secret police, that is responsible for what Mr. Mark Scott  
wrote, because what he wrote was as slip of the tongue, which he REFUSE TO SAY  
WAS A SLIP OF THE TONGUE."


COMMENT:

You misconstrue things that people say.  This is NOT what I said.  Sometimes it 
is a waist of time discussing with you.  Let others be the judges, since I 
don't have time to play around with you.  

You are a worker.  I am a worker.  YOur politics is anti working class, for no 
other class has proven to be able to defeat capitalism like our class has, 
outside of the wars for national liberation.   The working class is not engaged 
in a symbiotic type relationship with the bourgeoisie rendering it conservative 
or reactionary, like you and others peddle.

So, thank YOU  for your support.


f580

--- On Wed, 12/22/10, waistli...@aol.com <waistli...@aol.com> wrote:

From: waistli...@aol.com <waistli...@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [MLL] I denounce the statement below advocating . . . . .
To: marxist-leninist-list@lists.econ.utah.edu
Date: Wednesday, December 22, 2010, 5:43 PM



In a message dated 12/22/2010 6:53:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
frankied...@yahoo.com writes:

There was class war during the Bolshevik uprising, and there was class  war 
during war communism.  It is the Imperialists and not members of this  list 
who practice terrorism.  It is YOU and not the bourgeois secret police  who 
insists on sustaining what could have been a slip of the tongue or a mere  
haphazard comment.  Marxist would have understood what he meant... or at  
least, what we, as Marxist, understand by the role of force or violence in  
history.  

Comment

Yes there was class war as political insurrection during the period of the  
Bolshevik taking of state power. Class war is broader than insurrection and 
the  taking of power. 
Yes, there was Civil war and war against imperial invasion during the  
period of war communism. 

You state it is I and the intelligence agencies of the bourgeoisie,  
specifically the secret police, that is responsible for what Mr. Mark Scott  
wrote, because what he wrote was as slip of the tongue, which he REFUSE TO SAY  
WAS A SLIP OF THE TONGUE. 

Remember this is the same guy - Scott, who says that slavery had nothing to 
do with the Civil War and was an afterthought, which is the issue that 
raised  this entire discussion. 

Remember, I called Mr. Scott a redeemer historian - which he is,  because 
he said SLAVERY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CIVIL WAR and was an after  
thought. Scott then went berserk, - his standard response to anyone that holds 
a  
different opinion, and started quoting material from 2005, which is when HE  
- not I, raised the issue of exterminating individuals constituting a 
class. 

Then I responded to this old controversy from 2005, which Scott raised, and 
yet YOU claim it is I and the secret police that is raising the  
controversy?

Thanks for your support

WL. 





_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



      
_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



      
_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to