I would nominate Peter Osborne's pessimisstic, Adornoesque (is that a word?) critique of the potential for the development of the contemporary individual into a "different subject" at the end of his 2008 article on " Marx and the philosophy of time ( https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/article/marx-and-the-philosophy-of-time )." It seems to me a very strong, well-reasoned, and intuitively appealing argument contra Marx's expectations. I think it is wrong but only in the sense that it can be proven wrong in practice of the third thesis kind.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#39259): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/39259 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116301050/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
