On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 10:34 PM, Ed George wrote:

> 
> Nevertheless, it is also true that there is nothing in the mature Marx
> (post-48) that supports the view that he held to an immiseration thesis.

The absolute general law of capitalist accumulation in chapter 25 of volume one 
presents an immiseration thesis for *a portion* of the population rendered 
surplus by capitalist accumulation.

> 
> The greater the social wealth, the functioning capital, the extent and
> energy of its growth, and therefore also the greater the absolute mass of
> the proletariat and the productivity of its labour, the greater is the
> industrial reserve army. The same causes which develop the expansive power
> of capital, also develop the labour power at its disposal. The relative
> mass of the industrial reserve army thus increases with the potential
> energy of wealth. But the greater this reserve army in proportion to the
> active labour-army, the greater is the mass of a consolidated surplus
> population, whose misery is in inverse ratio to the amount of torture it
> has to undergo in the form of labour. The more extensive, finally, the
> pauperized sections of the working class and the industrial reserve army,
> the greater is official pauperism. This is the absolute general law of
> capitalist accumulation.
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#39268): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/39268
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116301050/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to