On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Barker wrote:
>> If we really think that would help, and we would use it for MPL, we >> could try to get it done -- but I doubt that it's worth it -- we have >> enough trouble keeping the wx back-ends maintained as it is. > Yes --- there is something to be said for keeping the number of backends > to a minimum. Each one needs to have a reason to exist ;) >> >>>> If you can come up with an self-contained example of this, a post >>>> tot he wxPython list may yield results. >>>> >>> It might be worth it just to get to the bottom of this. >> >> so are you working on an example? Or should I? > I'm happy to do it, but may not get to it for a few days. My own test > was to run "simple_plot_fps.py" with "handle_clip_rectangle" (in > backend_wx.py) turned on and off. But obviously the wxPython folks will > want a more standalone example. I am happy to keep backends around if someone cares enough about it to step up and maintain it. Michael you are stretched pretty thin w/ all the other stuff you are doing for matplotlib, and I know you don't use wx yourself or at work, so I suggest we let Ken or Chris or someone who has a vested interest in this backend pursue it. As it stands, wxagg is superior for almost every use case, and we want to encourage people to use it. Any effort we spend optimizing would be much better put into agg, since that would help almost every user, rather than the few who are using native wx. JDH ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
