> "Davini, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I read the "Myths" within the Minidisc.org page, and everything Mr. > > Woudenberg writes makes perfect sense to me, BUT - - - - Could > > someone please tell me WHY I REALLY DO hear a difference between > > discs then? I don't understand why there isn't a differnece in sound quality between blanks (If that is really the case)? I mean, why are some more expensive tha others? Are some not made better/easier for the laser to read/smoother inoperation or something akin to all of that? Cassettes definitely have higher qualities amongst them... Why not MDs? Thanks, c ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- MD: CD quality compared to M... las
- Re: MD: CD quality compared ... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blank... J. Coon
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in b... las
- Re: MD: sound quality difference... PrinceGaz
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... las
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... J. Coon
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... las
- MD: So old !!! Peter Forest
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Charles Redell
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? PrinceGaz
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Dave Kimmel
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Charles Redell
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? J. Coon
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? las
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Dave Hooper
- RE: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Davini, Mark
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Les
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? David W. Tamkin