On 8/26/00 7:05 PM, Les wrote: >Actually I wrote most of what you attribute to Larry, LOL I just realized that from reading Larry's comments in the last digest ;-) >You are correct about most and our disagreements are so little I'm >giving up on principle! I think we had a very good discussion. Thanks to everyone for being civil -- not that you wouldn't be, but we've all seen some of the other "discussions!" ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Les
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality PrinceGaz
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality J. Coon
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD jollity David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: CD quality compared to MD quality Michael Jones