On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:48:25 am Randall Arnold wrote: > This isn't about "us vs them". Intel is a part of the > community. And as for "their every word and action > being scrutinized", that's inflammatory and hyperbolic. > Let's avoid extreme dialog.
Well, the impression I get from the community is that it *is* "us vs them" -- where "us" is the virtuous community and "them" is the corporate interests. So, I don't think I was being inflammatory... I really think this is the way things are. > On the other hand, community members who aren't beholden > to corporate sponsors/participants are obliged to keep > corporate interests in check and drive a high degree of > transparency. Without it, you have no community-- just > a mob fed by walled gardeners. This sounds "us vs them." A struggle between classes. Just saying. :-) Look, I think we all agree on open source. We disagree that open /development/ is always the right thing to do in every case. I think that time-to-market is more important. -gabriel _______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list MeeGo-community@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
