On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote:

> I've said before and I say it again here, I consider performance
> comparisons pointless at this time.

Considering that e-d-s has a much more modest feature set than tracker
(tracker in general being a much more ambitious project), I would have
expected it to to trounce tracker in performance, which doesn't seem
to be the case.

This evidence might prompt to re-evaluate this part of the
architectural plans. Or at least leave the door open to transitioning
back to tracker when it's feasible.
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines

Reply via email to