On 10/01/2011 12:53 PM, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Gabriel Beddingfield<gabrb...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/29/2011 10:20 AM, Nasa wrote:
1) Concentrate on the handset and *ONLY* on it from now onward. "Do
one thing and do it best (tm)".
Why would you exclude 4/5 of the people involved in the meego project?
Handsets weren't even the largest part of the project...
Fine... pick IVI. Pick *something*.
MeeGo's complexity ({Netbook,Handset,IVI,Tablet} x {i586,armv7} x
{MeeGoCompliance,PlatformCompliance,DeviceCompliance}) was apparently too
much to bear even with corporate sponsorship. If you continue as a
community project, it's important to narrow this down in order to succeed.
++1 That is why I said so the first place. Trying to do everything and
in the same time proved us very wrong.
-Sivan
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
I don't see a problem with keeping the various implementations of MeeGo
alive, if there are people interested in contributing to them.
Naturally, if a project receives no active contributions it goes stale
and dies, but why kill it preemptively?
Dayo
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
