You don't need two libraries. As I said, a lot of these products already speak the memcached protocol or, alternatively, something like redis would provide you all of the functionality that you need from memcached plus the features that you're requesting (key-value store with replication, persistence, atomicity/transactions, etc). There are many things that memcached is better at than redis, but given the use case that you're describing, the advantages of memcached versus redis don't really apply to you, so switching to it wouldn't really hurt you at all and at the same time would, I believe, solve your problems.
http://redis.io/ <http://redis.io/> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br>wrote: > ehehe i know that there´s many others lock server, > but i don´t have ROM on my PIC18f4550 to put two libraries =( it would > be nice if i had a ARM or a x86 :/, but i don´t have :( > if i use memcache i could do it with my PIC > > 2011/2/4 Adam Lee <a...@fotolog.biz>: > > Yes. I'm starting to feel like a broken record, but I'd like to > reiterate > > that you are trying to solve problems using memcached that are better > solved > > by other, existing products. If you want a distributed lock, there are > many > > options-- I use zookeeper for this. If you want transactional nosql, > take a > > look at redis. Etc... These products are just as easy to use (a lot of > > them even speak memcached protocol) and would fit your needs much better. > > -- > > awl > > > > > > -- > Roberto Spadim > Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial > -- awl
