On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Kiran Kumar <krn1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi , > > We are using Memcache in a different/wrong way , that is Memcache as a > Complete Data Store itself . > > The setup of our Application is in such a way that , there are two Memcache > servers (Server1 and Server2 )where both of them acting as active active > (Master - Master ) each of them gets unique store of Data , and finally > repcached is applied on top of these severs for providing replication . > > The Data is being replicated bethween these two servers and i observed that > there is a small delay regarding the two servers being in sync with each > other > > I am using Xmemcached 1.4 version as Memcache Client . > > I have these two questions with respect to the above set up of our > Application . > > 1. Is the XMemcached Client Smart enough to read Key from Server2 , > incase it can't find that key in Sever 1 ( As i mentioned that there is a > small delay till both the servers are in synch with each other ) > > 2. Incase i configure my Memcache client to use > KetamaMemcachedSessionLocator inside the code , will this be of any help > with respect to the above scenario ?? >
There should be options for how the client handles a server failure: http://code.google.com/p/xmemcached/wiki/FailureMode_StandbyNode Failure doesn't mean 'key doesn't exist', though, it means 'server connection fails'. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
