Les Mikesell , Thanks for the link , but unfortunately that is no where related to my question above . anyway once again , What i was asking is that as there is some delay in Data Replication , will the Memcache Client checks server2 also in case if it doesn't found in Server 1 .
And does adding *KetamaMemcachedSessionLocator * to the code will help in anyway ?? On Wednesday, 17 October 2012 23:57:19 UTC+5:30, LesMikesell wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Kiran Kumar <krn...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hi , > > > > We are using Memcache in a different/wrong way , that is Memcache as a > > Complete Data Store itself . > > > > The setup of our Application is in such a way that , there are two > Memcache > > servers (Server1 and Server2 )where both of them acting as active > active > > (Master - Master ) each of them gets unique store of Data , and > finally > > repcached is applied on top of these severs for providing replication > . > > > > The Data is being replicated bethween these two servers and i observed > that > > there is a small delay regarding the two servers being in sync with > each > > other > > > > I am using Xmemcached 1.4 version as Memcache Client . > > > > I have these two questions with respect to the above set up of our > > Application . > > > > 1. Is the XMemcached Client Smart enough to read Key from Server2 , > > incase it can't find that key in Sever 1 ( As i mentioned that there > is a > > small delay till both the servers are in synch with each other ) > > > > 2. Incase i configure my Memcache client to use > > KetamaMemcachedSessionLocator inside the code , will this be of any > help > > with respect to the above scenario ?? > > > > There should be options for how the client handles a server failure: > http://code.google.com/p/xmemcached/wiki/FailureMode_StandbyNode > > Failure doesn't mean 'key doesn't exist', though, it means 'server > connection fails'. > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmi...@gmail.com <javascript:> >
