Rick S said >>> I'm sure there are thousands or maybe millions of
twins that would
disagree with your assessment. <<<

See earlier post about objective standards.  Plus, how is one to know
that they are telling the truth?  Personal anecdotes are subjective.

stemcell

On Oct 27, 11:31 am, Rick S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure there are thousands or maybe millions of twins that would
> disagree with your assessment.  No being a twin myself, I can never
> know for sure.  As for going beyond logic, I saw a very interesting
> video on TED  
> http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/jill_bolte_taylor_s_powerful_strok...
> where a brain scientist reveals what happenned to her during her
> stroke.  She calls it a powerful stroke of insight.  My point is not
> that we should not use logic and rationality.  Of course we should.
> But to suggest that there is no possibilty that something might exist
> that could provide more insight into our lives other than just using
> our minds in their conscious state might be too dogmatic.
>
> Rick S
>
> On Oct 27, 10:58 am, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > << And there's intuition, like when twins separated by some
> > distance know the other is hurt. >>
>
> > No, they don't.
>
> > <<Anyone who has studied Quantum physics even a little will realize
> > that there are things in the universe that seem to defy logic.  And >>
>
> > You're misusing the term "logic" here.  Quantum physics may have
> > propositions which contradict the propositions you use in everyday
> > life, but the logic that manipulates those propositions remains the
> > same.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to