On Oct 28, 4:06 am, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> “Red is a word used to refer to a light wavelength of about 650 nm. >> Whether you can see it or not or whether it looks purple to you does >> not change the wavelength. We use different words to refer to >> different wavelengths for simplicity sake. Red is red regardless of >> ones perception of it.” - J. > > Apparently you are using a limited and pseudoscientific epistemology. > ‘We’ don’t even know what waves nor light are. Tell me you don’t > accept the uncertainty principle. You further suggest that ‘we’ know > what a color is even if we can’t see it and don’t use a word for it. A > strange view indeed! Earlier the notion of scientific dogma arose. > Please tell me it ain’t so Joe!
Uhhhhhh...... Pseudoscientific? A strange view? WTF? Please elaborate on these claims. His description appears to be right on the mark. Research E&M and spectroscopy, for starters. -BC- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
