Noam peppers many of his critiques with pointed comments about
universities and education in general. Here are a couple that came up
first from ‘god google’.

Recent speech.
http://www.bu.edu/phpbin/buniverse/videos/view/?id=224

General views including Universities.
http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/197305--.htm

More general overviews.
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19740207.htm


Resources:
http://www.chomsky.info/
http://www.synaptic.bc.ca/ejournal/chomsky.htm
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Chomsky/Noam_Chomsky.html

A few thousand videos of him:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Noam+chomsky&search_type=&aq=f


On Nov 24, 4:26 pm, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The only book that I read was part of "Hegemony or Survival: America's
> Quest for Global Dominance" and a few articles by him in school.
>
> I am not that familiar with his work.  Where was he ever cynical of
> Ivy League institutions--not the ideas of these Ivy League
> institutions but the institutions themselves like he is cynical of
> government and corporate institutions?
>
> On Nov 24, 5:58 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > “I thought his point were good; however, Noam's an extreme liberal.
> > Noam is hyper cynical of all wealthy institutions unless it's an Ivy
> > League institution.” – Jason
>
> > I accept that you think his point(s) were good.
>
> > "Reality has a liberal bias." - Al Franken.
>
> > And, I doubt if many who study his works find him to be ‘liberal’. He
> > even examines how liberal/conservative have reversed definitions a few
> > times over the last few centuries in different countries and cultures
> > in his writing.
>
> > I don’t know for sure what you mean by ‘wealthy institutions’, so I
> > can only guess. Perhaps you mean governments? Churches? Corporations?
> > The Mafia?….difficult to tell.
>
> > As to his views about Universities, he has always been critical of
> > them…always.
>
> > As to cynicism, since this includes the meaning of distrust, I see no
> > reason to not hold that view about most institutions. In fact, that is
> > part of his definition of anarchy. I doubt if many ‘freethinkers’ here
> > would disagree with his definition. 
> > See:http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/rbr/noamrbr2.html
>
> > So, overall, I’m glad you liked and agreed with him. I find him to be
> > one of the few sane voices in a vast wasteland. This even though the
> > way he is absolutely banned from any of the corporate media, TV,
> > print, radio etc., speaks volumes about how ‘dangerous’ his clarity is
> > perceived as being by these institutions what with their vast and
> > vested interests.
>
> > Their propaganda against him is legion. Almost everyone who has NOT
> > read his works nor listened to him for any length of time considers
> > him at the very least ‘controversial’ and on the whole, dangerous.
> > Apparently it pays to advertise, which he addressed in the interview
> > you just watched.
>
> > On Nov 24, 3:38 pm, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > I thought his point were good; however, Noam's an extreme liberal.
> > > Noam is hyper cynical of all wealthy institutions unless it's an Ivy
> > > League institution.
>
> > > On Nov 24, 9:21 am, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I was a little surprised by some of Noam’s views on the election
> > > > process and results. Rather than start out with my views, you may find
> > > > his first presentation since the election of note.
>
> > > >http://www.democracynow.org/2008/11/24/noam_chomsky_what_next_the_ele...quoted
> > > > text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to