Orn, I am writing much of this out for the benefit of others. Your tai chi style of writing, drawing me out is good, but other will not understand much and at the moment I want them too.
In my opinion, the bottom line with tai chi is that it is an empiracle art. I had to reread and rethink what you said about that particlar women who cannot be "pushed" your qoutes. First of all she is short, which helps when no no striking is involved. Secondly you said that no one could "push" (your quotes) her. But if you are making a judgemnt as to who is better at push hands than it would seem that she can also move every one else, at least occaisionally. If she can and also cannot be moved then I would judge her the best in your circle. William Chen claims to have only practiced neutralization for about his first year. It was only later that he learned to effortlessly lift others straight up off the floor, both feet leaving the ground and using only light contact with his hands (I could barely feel them when ever he did this to me). It is this skill that that is hard to develop for all but seems to be harder for women to develop, in my experience, then men. That is the style of uprooting that CMC taught. Making others stumble backwards, fall forwards or to the sides, is also useful, for fighting, but according to CMC not the correct uproot. As for the "real" Tai Chi, I would suggest you look for a top certified student on Ma Yueh Liang. CMC was one of the best, best nearly every one who experienced both agreed the Ma was the best in the world at the time and had a much more complete system. He has top students in China who have surpassed his level and some very good ones in the USA. As far as fighting goes, as far as I know Ma never really showed it or taught it. If one is really a master of the tai chi training methods then it doesn't take long to become a great fighter, whether for sport ot for self defense. The later (self defense) is what I consider "real" fighting. CMC showed it to Robert Smith or so Smith writes in his chapter on CMC in his book "Chinese Boxing, Masters and Methods. In that chapter there is a story of CMC also using push hands for fighting. CMC knocks out a mantis style boxer by bouncing him of the wall. However it is easy to beat an externalist with push hands, if you also know how to fight for real which invlolves being able to slip, perry and absord strikes. On the bottom of 42 and top of page 43 CMC demonstrates real fighting to Robert Smith. Their are only two people I know of who are real masters and also teach real self defense fighting to their students. William C. C. Chen is NOT one of them. He teaches sport fighting. One of these masters is extremelly soft, except when he hits. His strikes are internal though. If he went after me for real, he would beat or even kill me within a seconds. I heard the other one is very soft too, but I have never met him. I have played with one of his students and from that I have come to the conclusion that this other master is also a devastating fighter. Push hands is a training method and an important one, but it is often way over emphasized for fighting. Push hands, done properly, is actually more important for health than for fighting, but it is hard perhaps impossible to do tai chi fighting without push hands. It is the easiast way to learn to put Peng Lu Ji and An on a circle. But the most important thing is that it is all but impossible to correct the form without push hands. The form, done well, is very good for health. However, it is not a cure all as demonstrated by Patrick Watson, Stanley Israel, Yang Cheng Fu and others. judging push hands as who is the best then "pushing s On Jan 6, 11:04 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't insist. It is all up to you. Overall, I talk about the real > Tai Chi, not the external one. > > On Jan 6, 7:41 pm, Isparklaria <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Orn, > > > Women have a lower center of gravity and less muscle excess muscle > > tension. However, I don't know if they would be the best in push hands > > since it is a training method or sport that favors certain aspects of > > the male mind. I'd have to write more than I'd like to write now to > > really explain it. If you insist I'll try later. When non sportive > > striking is thrown into the mix (chops, eye gouges, palm strikes, > > groin kicks, shin kicks and much much more) then the sensitvity that > > women have along with the lower center for good balance makes them get > > good real fast. Men typically surpase women, because the women rarely > > stay at it for years and years. In external arts the men are generally > > much better than the women, but what they are doing is not nearly so > > good for real self defense. > > > As far as Patrick Watson goes, he may have been the only American > > student of Cheng Man Ching who was told to open a school. Then again > > he may not have been. I don't know for sure. I have heard that he was > > best American student but also that he didn't get along with the other > > top students. Whose fault that was, I can only guess. As far aa all of > > the Students goes, Huang Xing Xian was considered the best by CMC. I > > think William Chen was considered the second best. I heard that when > > Patrick Watson was asked about William Chen he admited that William > > was better. However, I heard that Patrick Watson did claim that he was > > CMC's top student without qualifying it by saying top American > > student. > > > The Cheng Man Ching school was eventually handed down to Stanley > > Israel who was highly skilled even though his method was too forceful > > for my taste. The people running it before Stanley were not nearly as > > good. Stanley also once tied for first in the U S Judo Championships > > and was a prison guard. He was also obese like Patrick and also died > > relatively young. So much fo tryong to imitate Yang Cheng Fu, who was > > obese and also died young. My combat tai chi teacher, who is an > > amazing fighter and a retired police officer is also obese, and his > > health is not good. No matter he is extremelly fast sensitive and can > > hit very hard from all sorts of weird angles. > > > On Jan 6, 8:34 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "... women are pound for pound much better fighters than men..." - Ish > > > > Ish, I fully agree! The top Tai Chi student in our School is a very > > > very short and now very old woman. No one seems to be able to 'push' > > > her.... Many of the other top students are women too. The fact is that > > > most women don't have to empty so much muscle bound tension in their > > > bodies as most men do. > > > > On Jan 6, 4:07 pm, Isparklaria <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think that the reason for the foot bindings was to disable woman so > > > > they could not fight or run away. In real fighting (not sportfighting, > > > > Bruce Lee move, fancy martial arts or whatever) women are pound for > > > > pound much better fighters than men. Sad to say most of them never > > > > learned how to fight in a way suited to their natural attributes. > > > > Also, many women will not fight unless their children are threatened. > > > > > On Jan 6, 2:04 pm, CrossBow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Ah, that old crap about small feet is bunk! Your thinking about when > > > > > they > > > > > used to mutilate their feet with wrappings. Now, I have small feet, > > > > > and > > > > > they are blue! > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Clogtowner <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi y'all - I'll bet your aunt has small feet. I've often fancied > > > > > > trying the foot fetish. It is popular in Japan. Of course, they need > > > > > > small feet as our regular sized ones would obscure the fun over > > > > > > there. > > > > > > > On Jan 6, 9:18 am, CrossBow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks! Ha. I have the paperback version of Sun Tzu on my desk > > > > > > > in plain > > > > > > > view and can't wait for one of the guys here at work to freak > > > > > > > out....it's > > > > > > so > > > > > > > unlady like to study ...war... geesh:) > > > > > > > > Ever get addicted to Mahjong? > > > > > > > > My aunt Yumiko is full-blood Japanese and came over in her > > > > > > > twenties and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > culture bug bit me when I was little. She had full silk kimono's > > > > > > > and tea > > > > > > > sets along with a huge pile of art supplies at her house. She is > > > > > > > loaded > > > > > > > with personal charisma and still today has a sheet of black hair > > > > > > > down to > > > > > > her > > > > > > > hips and a classically flawless Japanese facial structure. A > > > > > > > great > > > > > > beauty. > > > > > > > Martial artist she is not, but her mind and way of doing thing > > > > > > > is still > > > > > > > culturally linked to Bushido! Haven't seen Yumi in few years, > > > > > > > but I want > > > > > > to > > > > > > > tell her I understand more now, how americans and japanese of her > > > > > > generation > > > > > > > and slightly before feel about each other - about the great > > > > > > > wars. My > > > > > > > generation is going to have some of the same issues with Arabic > > > > > > > Peoples. > > > > > > > How she deals with it is important:) > > > > > > > > Through my sister I was introduced to the Bruce Lee phenomenon and > > > > > > martial > > > > > > > arts. It stuck for years and I still love a good viewing of > > > > > > > Enter The > > > > > > > Dragon...cheesy as it is;) My former grand love affair in > > > > > > > college was > > > > > > > American Chinese with pure blood parents. He is a Kendo expert > > > > > > > with a > > > > > > full > > > > > > > body tattoo, and I just found him on facebook after all these > > > > > > > years. He > > > > > > is > > > > > > > a fount of all things Chinese because his parents raised him in > > > > > > > two > > > > > > > languages - two cultures. > > > > > > > > Envious of you who know Tai Chi ! We are going back to Karate > > > > > > > class this > > > > > > > spring, together, me and my daughter. Sure to get my bum kicked:) > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:06 PM, ornamentalmind < > > > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > For more about Sun Tsu, the standard source has some on him. > > > > > > > >http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Sun+Tsu > > > > > > > > I read his Art book many years ago. If you appreciate the > > > > > > > > general > > > > > > > > motif, any of the classics will further, from the Yellow > > > > > > > > Emperor to > > > > > > > > the I Ching...from the Tao Te Ching to any good book on the > > > > > > > > game of > > > > > > > > Go. > > > > > > > > > I had some wonderful books on Japanese art and architecture > > > > > > > > when I was > > > > > > > > a kid. I was always attracted to their esthetics too. > > > > > > > > > I started to study Tai Chi around 1970 and have been an > > > > > > > > instructor for > > > > > > > > decades. > > > > > > > >http://www.taichifoundation.org/Yes, this has its origins in > > > > > > > >China > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > I first learned the game of Go in the late 1950s and never > > > > > > > > played > > > > > > > > chess after doing so. > > > > > > > > >http://www.usgo.org/index.htmlAnd, yes even though it is the > > > > > > > >national > > > > > > > > game of Japan, it is believed to have originated at least > > > > > > 3,000 years > > > > > > > > ago in China. > > > > > > > > > I studied 5 element acupuncture, admittedly of Chinese origin > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > few years, after having studied Tibetan medicine for a few > > > > > > > > years too. > > > > > > > >http://worsleyacupuncture.com/ > > > > > > > >http://www.tibetanmedicine.com/index.html > > > > > > > > > It was only after studying acupuncture that I finally groked > > > > > > > > Taoism. > > > > > > > > > The cultures, while intertwined, have enormous differences. > > > > > > > > This is > > > > > > > > easily studied. > > > > > > > > > On Jan 5, 1:27 pm, CrossBow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Oh, I believe the trial was real we have to cover our asses > > > > > > > > > to some > > > > > > > > > degree. I don't personally know of anyone that thinks Bush > > > > > > > > > didn't > > > > > > > > fabricate > > > > > > > > > an excuse anymore, but I suppose you can find them up the > > > > > > > > > road in the > > > > > > > > > closest baptist church. Check out the Great Derangement when > > > > > > > > > you have > > > > > > > > > time...one link I posted had a free e version. I would be > > > > > > > > > pissed if > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > was a > > > > > > > > > reporter in this era, how the hell would you know if what you > > > > > > > > > see > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > own eyes is real? > > > > > > > > > > Pre-emptive strike is only used to effect if it can be > > > > > > > > > successful.. > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > Bush whack-job was not in the long perspective was it? It was > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > bitchslap > > > > > > > > > that hit the person standing next to the one you wanted to > > > > > > > > > hit, > > > > > > > > respectively > > > > > > > > > eh? > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Isparklaria < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Whether or not shock and awe was out of Sun Tzu or not, > > > > > > > > > > Bush made > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > concessions to modern geopolitical realities by giving a > > > > > > > > > > shout > > > > > > before > > > > > > > > > > the attack. The surprise was lost (Sun Tzu uses surprise as > > > > > > > > > > one of > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > most important weapons) but we looked a bit better in the > > > > > > > > > > eyes of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > world by offering not to attack if Sadam Hussien would > > > > > > > > > > agree to > > > > > > leave > > > > > > > > > > the country. THat way the whole thing could look like > > > > > > > > > > Saddam's > > > > > > fault. > > > > > > > > > > If he would just leave, we wouldn't need to attack. > > > > > > > > > > > Right now I am wondering whether or not the real Saddam did > > > > > > > > > > leave > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > country. Perhaps Bush wanted to attack under any > > > > > > > > > > circumstances. > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps the trial was just a show with a fake Saddam and the > > > > > > execution > > > > > > > > > > also faked. Well this is probably not the case but I rarely > > > > > > > > > > refrain > > > > > > > > > > from questioning the information we are fed. > > > > > > > > > > > As for the current sittuation. I don't know if it was > > > > > > > > > > planned, but > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > the long run it may very well benefit the neocons. The mess > > > > > > > > > > is so > > > > > > bad, > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if it can be improved much in 4 or 8 years. > > > > > > > > > > Soon the > > > > > > > > > > masses will be ready the typical chicken hawk neocon > > > > > > > > > > candidates > > > ... > > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
