Thank you. Damn cheap bastid too! One day I will get my hands on a
113.
On Wednesday, July 20, 2005, at 09:17 PM, JabbaHursty wrote:
now you are a man of integrity :)
At 10:08 PM 7/20/2005, you wrote:
Uh, I reached the end at 113 and 115
On Wednesday, July 20, 2005, at 12:34 PM, JabbaHursty wrote:
it's sad to hear that the 210 is a step back from the 124 in so many
ways. many of us will reach the end of the line with 124, 126 and
107
At 03:30 PM 7/20/2005, you wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:47:05PM -0400, Darrell W. Sigmon wrote:
Any one know any thing about the 1997 300D?
I'm looking at one and the only thing I don't like about it is it
is
NOT
turboed.
The 210 is not considered as robust of a car as a 124, and is
certainly
nowhere near as simple or inexpensive to maintain as a 124 (which is
not as
simple or inexpensive as a 123). The 210's known problems seem to
hover
around poor rustproofing and cheapening of suspension components,
but
supposedly the ride is wonderful.
Do not be deceived by the engine being non-turbo, that non-turbo
engine puts
out more power than the 2.5 turbo that preceeded it in the 124s - I
believe
140 hp. The transmission also likely does not have a dipstick and is
not
considered serviceable, but it is highly recommended that it get
periodic
services.
K
--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner
1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
