Looking for sources of waste oil tells you a lot about the restaurants
in your area. When the waste oil is solid at room temperature, common
sense tells you to look elsewhere for fueling - and eating.

McDonald's loses on both counts.

-Dave Walton

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Luther <benz-n-h...@gulseth.net> wrote:
> Frybrid is in this for profit.  Please show me independent and repeatable
> research that shows where VO (WVO or SVO) will not cause long term damage to
> an engine.  In 5 years of being around WVO/biodiesel, no one has shown me
> this research.  VO must be heated over 350F to make the viscosity similar to
> diesel.
>
> A quote from the Frybrid website:
> "
> The simplest way to explain this is with a simple analogy: Imagine placing a
> pan on the stove, pouring a small amount of vegetable oil in the pan, and
> turning the heat to high. The pan will begin to heat up and as it does it
> will heat the oil, around 300F the oil will start to smoke, then turn black,
> stick to the pan, and destroy it. Now put out the fire, open all the doors
> and windows and allow the air to clear.*
> "
> *
> BUZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTTT, WRONG!  Fries are cooked in oil at temps around 350F!
> "
> On a typical day at McDonald's, oil temperature in the fryer averages about
> 340 degrees F. So when a cook grabs strips of icy potatoes out of the
> freezer and tosses them into hot oil, water in the potatoes immediately
> begins to evaporate. Bubbles and steam emerge, creating an enormous cycle of
> heat transfer between the oil and the potato. The process, Farkas says, may
> be the most important factor in producing the texture of the final fried
> product.
> "
> from http://ucdavismagazine.ucdavis.edu/issues/su01/feature_2.html
>
> or
> "
> Cooking time in 360 degree F Oil
> "
> from http://www.mvproduce.com/ffries.html
>
> And for the smoke points of different oils:
> "
>
>  1. Wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point> lists the
>     smoke points of some popular oils as:
>         * Canola oil (Refined): 468 degrees Fahrenheit (242 degrees
>           Celsius)
>         * Corn oil (Refined): 450 degrees Fahrenheit (232 degrees
>           Celsius)
>         * Grapeseed oil: 420 degrees Fahrenheit (216 degrees Celsius)
>         * Lard: 370 degrees Fahrenheit (182 degrees Celsius)
>         * Peanut oil (Refined): 450 degrees Fahrenheit (232 degrees
>           Celsius)
>         * Safflower oil (Refined): 450 degrees Fahrenheit (232 degrees
>           Celsius)
>         * Sunflower oil (Semirefined): 450 degrees Fahrenheit (232
>           degrees Celsius)
>         * Vegetable shortening: 360 degrees Fahrenheit (182 degrees
>           Celsius)
>               o These smoke points are not set in stone, as much
>                 depends on the oil brand and refinement process
>                 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooking_oil>. A general
>                 rule is that lighter, more refined oils have higher
>                 smoke points <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooking_oil>.
>
> "
> from http://www.mahalo.com/How_to_Deep_Fry_Anything
>
> Given that Frybrid blatantly lies about the smoke point of VO, what else in
> their "bibliography of research papers" is stretching the truth or a blatant
> lie?  Oh yes, the wonders of the internet, where you can say anything you
> want and find P.T. Barnum suckers all day long.....
>
> Luther, still not sold on vegetable oil as a diesel fuel substitute
>
>
> Michael E. Esh wrote:
>>
>> Here is the site of the system I am currently using to burn waste
>> vegetable
>> oil. (WVO)  I simple filter the oil using a small centrifuge.  I do not
>> process it into bio diesel.  What I am doing is very safe.  This site
>> explains the process very clearly.
>> http://www.frybrid.com/svo.htm
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
>> [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com]on Behalf Of Luther
>> Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 1:01 AM
>> To: Mercedes Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Doing SVO Wrong
>>
>>
>> Please provide the link to the study you read.
>>
>> Luther
>>
>> Tyler wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> These sort of engine problems are essentially unheard of in MB diesels
>>> that haven't run WVO.
>>>
>>> I still stand by the claim that WVO is good, but only if the oil is
>>> heated really hot, and filtered really well (and it almost never is).
>>> I did read a well designed scientific study once which showed no
>>> measurable long term wear increase using well heated WVO compared to
>>> regular diesel, but cold WVO caused serious engine damage in a short
>>> time period. I suppose people will want a link... I'll see if I can
>>> find it.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Tyler
>>>
>>> On May 8, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Michael LaFleur wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why is it that every benz that has an engine problem that was run on
>>>> WVO, WVO is blamedas the reason for the failure, but every other benz
>>>> that has an engine problem, diesel is not the blame?
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>
> --
> Luther   KB5QHU    Alma, Ark
> '87 300SDL (281,xxx mi)
> '85 Ford F250 6.9 diesel (x59,xxx mi) BioBeast
> '82 300CD (183 kmi)
> '82 300D  (74 kmi) getting donor engine-sold
> '85 300D (280,176) parts car sans engine "The Accordion"
>
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to