On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Dotan wrote:
Wow, you've gone pretty far from the debate of "Hamakor discussions not getting to forums readers". I'll rephrase it here too "As individuals none of hamakors members publish the discussions on web forums."

  So, you, personally, as a member of Hamakor, are guilty of not publishing
discussions on web forums. Maybe instead of complaining, try doing
something.

  Please define "web forums". In what way the archive I setup isn't a "web
forum"? It's on the web, and it's a fourm for discussion.

If you're not volunteering, do you know anyone who wants to volunteer to do it?
If you answered "no" on both questions, why do you continue to bring this
issue up??

Say "yes this is acceptable" and I might bother to make the effort.
The first attamp ended despite Uri's good will to do what you are now asking me to do.

  I really do not know why Uri stopped the sync. We must ask him. However,
Uri is not on the board, and thus you cannot blame the board for Uri's
one-sided decision to stop the sync.

And by the way I remind that I once wrote in this discussion
"I'll have to think about it but currently I'm not a member and watching closely

for the last few months I tend  not to and I prefer to slowly disconnect my
relations with Hamakor and concentrate on doing."

  Why do you have to disconnect your assoication with Hamakor in order to
concentrate on doing? Why not do in coordination and under the blessing of
Hamakor instead of duplicating effort by working in parralel?

By fact it limits, what you're saying is that others are more limiting. In this case I suggest not to take those others as the model. I can say for the few Amutot I am and was a member of that they have weekly meetings to discuss the amuta activity. Yes, weekly meeting not a yearly meeting, so the electronic discussion are easier to participate but it's not far more extensive then others discussions.

  We're talking about an Amuta with over 200 registered friends. If there is
a group of more than 200 individuals scattered across the country that meet
weekly on a strictly voluntary basis (with not even travel expenses
returned), I guess they are much more devout to their goals (or much less
busy) than Hamakor members. In any case, this will not work for Hamakor.

You are not in sync, sorry.
In regard to the website he contacted them by the means they called and offered his help. He didn't participate in the rest of the discussions about W2L (which I think is a lost to all involved). You may look at it as if he choose to do and not to talk in a language he doesn't like but you are choosing a twisted view of things.

  If the LANGUAGE of the discussion was a problem that's one thing, but
you're not talking about language, you're talking about the fact that the
information once passed through SMTP as a reason to disqualify it. Again,
how does a webmail account differ from a forum?

BTW - no, I don't have time, it's not my job and I don't know how to do it but the rest you may keep to yourself and despite all that I might have done the effort if I knew it has support.

  The fact is it has wide support. You keep acting as if the board has
somehow prevented it from happening which cannot be farther from the truth.

  Alon

--
This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
GPG public key at http://8ln.org/pubkey.txt
Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627  DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 -=[ Random Fortune ]=-
Prediction is very difficult, especially of the future.
- Niels Bohr

Reply via email to