Toby A Inkster wrote:
Martin McEvoy wrote:
...a summary is that on the whole nothing new is needed for a comment
microformat, just use hAtom, but instead of using rel-bookmark use the
html link type (http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#h-6.12)
rel-section.
Why not rel=bookmark?
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12
| Refers to a bookmark. A bookmark is a link to a key entry point within
| an extended document. The title attribute may be used, for example, to
| label the bookmark. Note that several bookmarks may be defined in each
| document.
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-design-pattern#rel.3D.22bookmark.22
| By convention, this entry point also captures the notion of a
"permalink".
Agreed, I also feel that in order for a parser to extract comments only
from a page a different link type is needed for a comment, it will help
distinguish a comment from the article.
Having said that I am thinking re-use XFN rel-contact for this link
type, and use rel-bookmark for backwards compatibility with existing
parsers eg:
<a rel="contact bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
|contact could be parsed as the in-reply-to Atom Threading Extension
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4685).
|Thanks
--
Martin McEvoy
http://weborganics.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
