Just so I get this straight, what's the official Wiki pages we're using to capture all of this?
Regards, etc... On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin McEvoy wrote: >> >> Toby A Inkster wrote: >>> >>> Why not rel=bookmark? >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12 >>> >>> | Refers to a bookmark. A bookmark is a link to a key entry point within >>> | an extended document. The title attribute may be used, for example, to >>> | label the bookmark. Note that several bookmarks may be defined in each >>> | document. >>> >>> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-design-pattern#rel.3D.22bookmark.22 >>> >>> | By convention, this entry point also captures the notion of a >>> "permalink". >>> >> Agreed, I also feel that in order for a parser to extract comments only >> from a page a different link type is needed for a comment, it will help >> distinguish a comment from the article. >> >> Having said that I am thinking re-use XFN rel-contact for this link type, >> and use rel-bookmark for backwards compatibility with existing parsers eg: >> >> <a rel="contact bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a> >> >> |contact could be parsed as the in-reply-to Atom Threading Extension >> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4685). > > Please see http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema > > Thanks > > > -- > Martin McEvoy > > http://weborganics.co.uk/ > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-new mailing list > microformats-new@microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new > -- David Janes Mercenary Programmer http://code.davidjanes.com _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new