http://bit.ly/1ClPQ1f

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
wrote:

> A /13 provides 524,286 usable IPs (before further subnetting).
>
> I think people in this thread need to find a "Routing for dummies" (no
> name calling intended) book or video. This is all networking 101 stuff that
> people either have completely wrong or are clueless about.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"tim2" <[email protected]>
> *To: *"Mikrotik Users" <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Sunday, December 21, 2014 6:36:06 AM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
>
> You have a /13 or a /28 which provides 14 usable ip, s.  1 is for gateway
> and the other is your primary router.  To control your traffic your
> customer gateway is the IP on your router.
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Scott Reed
> Date:12/20/2014 3:30 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Mikrotik Users
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
>
> The one they gave you is critical.  The fact that you did not use it is
> probably an indication of why are are needing help with this. The list
> is not the place to give a full IP routing tutorial, but you need to use
> the .240, which also a /28 and has 16 address, 14 of which can be used
> by devices.  The remainder of the 256 block space can be divided and
> used however you want.
> So, assuming that your are using the first 16 addresses, you could put 8
> address somewhere on your network by putting a.b.c.17/29 on a router
> port.  That becomes the gateway address for devices that connect to that
> port.  In OSPF you will tell it to redistribute connected routes and you
> will put a.b.c.16/29 in the Network section.
>
> On 12/20/2014 3:03 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > If you want the actual subnet the upstream provider gave me was
> > 255.255.255.240 but I put in 255.255.255.0
> >
> > Which I have block of /13 which only 12 useable ips since the 13^th
> > one is upstream provider gateway IP.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > *From:*[email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Scott Reed
> > *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 2:56 PM
> > *To:* Mikrotik Users
> > *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
> >
> > Routing works by one device knowing the next device to send a packet
> > to.  So the upstream knows that all of you addresses get sent to the
> > one on your gateway.  The provider's devices don't care how the data
> > gets to the destination, just that it goes to your router.  Your OSPF
> > will tell your headend router how to get the data to the end point.
> > So, to fully answer your question, you need to answer the one I have
> > asked you several times. What is the subnet mask our your headend
> > router connecting to the upstream?  Give us that and we can quit
> > surmising what you might do and give you a how to do it.
> >
> > Also, from one of your comments, you can tell OSPF whether or not to
> > propagate your static routers.
> >
> > On 12/20/2014 2:09 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
> >
> >     @ Scott
> >     Addresses come in pPowers of 2, so you probably have 16 addresses
> >     in the block. So, need to know what subnet mask you use to
> >     connect.  If you are using a /29 or /30, the rest can be located
> >     anywhere on the network. Let OSPF do the work.  If you are using
> >     the /28 to connect, you will either need to get your provider to
> >     change it or get the rest of the addresses so you can subnet them.
> >
> >     How many addresses do you want at the "remote" site?
> >
> >     Let's say you have a block of 16, a /28. You can have a block of
> >     8, a /29, at the headend and connected to the provider.  Then you
> >     can have 8 more somewhere else on the network.  As long as you put
> >     the address in OSPF correctly, the 8 addresses from the second
> >     half can be anywhere on your network and OSPF will get them routed
> >
> >     I don't know if I can even spit up the block like how your saying
> >     because I only have 1 gateway IP address from the upstream
> >     provider unless there is something I don't know about because one
> >     mikrotik router (core) router is handling the ip's then from there
> >     its ospf over wireless ptp link to an other mikrotik router with
> >     totally different internal IP address from router a haves.
> >
> >     @ Christian
> >
> >     So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route
> >     the whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just
> >     setting a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a.  Or if it
> >     is ospf you could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a
> >     1:1 nat to a private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just
> >     not clear on your setup.
> >
> >     This is how I got the network currently setup:
> >     modem ----: routerboard a (w/static wan IP's w/ospf) then the link
> >     is on ether is going for my ptp to other routerboard b (running
> >     ospf also) on ether1 then I want ether 2-4 run to sectors etc.
> >
> >     So I need to figure out how to route the static wan ip's over ospf
> >     from routerboard a to b etc..
> >
> >     Tim
> >
> >     *From:*[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Christian
> >     Palecek
> >     *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 1:07 PM
> >     *To:* Mikrotik Users
> >     *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
> >
> >     So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route
> >     the whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just
> >     setting a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a.  Or if it
> >     is ospf you could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a
> >     1:1 nat to a private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just
> >     not clear on your setup.
> >
> >     Christian Palecek
> >
> >     Network Administrator
> >
> >     Cybernet Inc.
> >
> >     Hamilton, MT
> >
> >
> >
> >     -------- Original message --------
> >     From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     Date:12/20/2014 10:48 AM (GMT-07:00)
> >     To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]>
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
> >
> >     Scott I got block of 13 and I can go all the way of block of 254 if I
> >     wanted to.
> >
> >     Tim
> >
> >
> >     On 2014-12-20 12:21, Scott Reed wrote:
> >     > How many addresses do they give you?
> >     > What is the subnet mask you use on your connection to the upstream?
> >     >
> >     > On 12/20/2014 12:07 PM, [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> >     >> Well the upstream provider have the static ip's scripted inside
> the
> >     >> modem. So I don't think they are actually routing the ip's
> >     directly to
> >     >> me.
> >     >>
> >     >> So it looks like I'm going have go bat route setup if that is
> >     correct.
> >     >>
> >     >> Tim
> >     >>
> >     >> On 2014-12-20 10:59, Christian Palecek wrote:
> >     >>> I think you are going to have to use dst-nat as a 1:1 nat, unless
> >     >>> they
> >     >>> actually are routing you ip's, then you would just route them
> >     like
> >     >>> you
> >     >>> would any subnet.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Christian Palecek
> >     >>> Network Administrator
> >     >>> Cybernet Inc.
> >     >>> Hamilton, MT
> >     >>>
> >     >>> -------- Original message --------
> >     >>> From: T Maylone <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     >>> Date:12/20/2014 7:33 AM (GMT-07:00)
> >     >>> To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     >>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
> >     >>>
> >     >>> example routing through two routers
> >     >>>
> >     >>> assume your public ip is 1.1.1.1
> >     >>> assume your provider routes 1.1.1.1 to your router A ether port 1
> >     >>> assume there is a relationship between router a ether 2
> >     10.254.0.1/29
> >     >>> [2] and router B ether 1 10.254.0.2
> >     >>> assume there is a relationship between router b ether 2
> >     10.253.0.1/29
> >     >>> [3] and router c ether 1 10.253.0.2
> >     >>>
> >     >>> In router A
> >     >>> IP route 1.1.1.1 10.254.0.2
> >     >>>
> >     >>> In router B
> >     >>> IP router 1.1.1.1 10.253.0.2
> >     >>>
> >     >>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Tim Reichhart
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     >>> wrote:
> >     >>>
> >     >>>> Guys
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> I am just wondering if I have multiple wan IP's on ether1 is
> >     an way
> >     >>>> to place it onto other ethernet interfaces? Also I am running
> >     ospf
> >     >>>> on my routers so lets say router A is the main core with wan
> IP's
> >     >>>> and router B needs an wan IP from router A for an internal IP
> how
> >     >>>> would I route that?
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Tim
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> _______________________________________________
> >     >>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >     >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users [1]
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Links:
> >     >>> ------
> >     >>> [1] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >     >>> [2] http://10.254.0.1/29
> >     >>> [3] http://10.253.0.1/29
> >     >>>
> >     >>> _______________________________________________
> >     >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >     >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> -----
> >     >> No virus found in this message.
> >     >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> >     >> Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date:
> >     >> 12/20/14
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > Scott Reed
> >     > Owner
> >     > NewWays Networking, LLC
> >     > Wireless Networking
> >     > Network Design, Installation and Administration
> >     > Mikrotik Advanced Certified
> >     > www.nwwnet.net <http://www.nwwnet.net>
> >     > (765) 855-1060  (765) 439-4253  Toll-free (855) 231-6239
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >
> >     Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >
> >     [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     No virus found in this message.
> >     Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> >     Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date:
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>


-- 
-RickG KyWiFi
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to