Sorry, I didnt intend it to be rude, only helpful. I'm amazed at how many times "we in this industry" forget to utilize the web for the information it offers :)
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Daniel Biland <[email protected]> wrote: > That was allmost rude ;) [image: 😊] > > Gesendet mit AquaMail für Android > http://www.aqua-mail.com > > Am 21. Dezember 2014 20:02:46 schrieb RickG <[email protected]>: > >> http://bit.ly/1ClPQ1f >> >> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> A /13 provides 524,286 usable IPs (before further subnetting). >>> >>> I think people in this thread need to find a "Routing for dummies" (no >>> name calling intended) book or video. This is all networking 101 stuff that >>> people either have completely wrong or are clueless about. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"tim2" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *"Mikrotik Users" <[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *Sunday, December 21, 2014 6:36:06 AM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask >>> >>> You have a /13 or a /28 which provides 14 usable ip, s. 1 is for >>> gateway and the other is your primary router. To control your traffic your >>> customer gateway is the IP on your router. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone >>> >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: Scott Reed >>> Date:12/20/2014 3:30 PM (GMT-05:00) >>> To: Mikrotik Users >>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask >>> >>> The one they gave you is critical. The fact that you did not use it is >>> probably an indication of why are are needing help with this. The list >>> is not the place to give a full IP routing tutorial, but you need to use >>> the .240, which also a /28 and has 16 address, 14 of which can be used >>> by devices. The remainder of the 256 block space can be divided and >>> used however you want. >>> So, assuming that your are using the first 16 addresses, you could put 8 >>> address somewhere on your network by putting a.b.c.17/29 on a router >>> port. That becomes the gateway address for devices that connect to that >>> port. In OSPF you will tell it to redistribute connected routes and you >>> will put a.b.c.16/29 in the Network section. >>> >>> On 12/20/2014 3:03 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>> > >>> > Scott >>> > >>> > If you want the actual subnet the upstream provider gave me was >>> > 255.255.255.240 but I put in 255.255.255.0 >>> > >>> > Which I have block of /13 which only 12 useable ips since the 13^th >>> > one is upstream provider gateway IP. >>> > >>> > Tim >>> > >>> > *From:*[email protected] >>> > [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Scott Reed >>> > *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 2:56 PM >>> > *To:* Mikrotik Users >>> > *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask >>> > >>> > Routing works by one device knowing the next device to send a packet >>> > to. So the upstream knows that all of you addresses get sent to the >>> > one on your gateway. The provider's devices don't care how the data >>> > gets to the destination, just that it goes to your router. Your OSPF >>> > will tell your headend router how to get the data to the end point. >>> > So, to fully answer your question, you need to answer the one I have >>> > asked you several times. What is the subnet mask our your headend >>> > router connecting to the upstream? Give us that and we can quit >>> > surmising what you might do and give you a how to do it. >>> > >>> > Also, from one of your comments, you can tell OSPF whether or not to >>> > propagate your static routers. >>> > >>> > On 12/20/2014 2:09 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>> > >>> > @ Scott >>> > Addresses come in pPowers of 2, so you probably have 16 addresses >>> > in the block. So, need to know what subnet mask you use to >>> > connect. If you are using a /29 or /30, the rest can be located >>> > anywhere on the network. Let OSPF do the work. If you are using >>> > the /28 to connect, you will either need to get your provider to >>> > change it or get the rest of the addresses so you can subnet them. >>> > >>> > How many addresses do you want at the "remote" site? >>> > >>> > Let's say you have a block of 16, a /28. You can have a block of >>> > 8, a /29, at the headend and connected to the provider. Then you >>> > can have 8 more somewhere else on the network. As long as you put >>> > the address in OSPF correctly, the 8 addresses from the second >>> > half can be anywhere on your network and OSPF will get them routed >>> > >>> > I don’t know if I can even spit up the block like how your saying >>> > because I only have 1 gateway IP address from the upstream >>> > provider unless there is something I don’t know about because one >>> > mikrotik router (core) router is handling the ip’s then from there >>> > its ospf over wireless ptp link to an other mikrotik router with >>> > totally different internal IP address from router a haves. >>> > >>> > @ Christian >>> > >>> > So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route >>> > the whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just >>> > setting a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a. Or if it >>> > is ospf you could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a >>> > 1:1 nat to a private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just >>> > not clear on your setup. >>> > >>> > This is how I got the network currently setup: >>> > modem ----: routerboard a (w/static wan IP’s w/ospf) then the link >>> > is on ether is going for my ptp to other routerboard b (running >>> > ospf also) on ether1 then I want ether 2-4 run to sectors etc. >>> > >>> > So I need to figure out how to route the static wan ip’s over ospf >>> > from routerboard a to b etc.. >>> > >>> > Tim >>> > >>> > *From:*[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Christian >>> > Palecek >>> > *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 1:07 PM >>> > *To:* Mikrotik Users >>> > *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask >>> > >>> > So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route >>> > the whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just >>> > setting a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a. Or if it >>> > is ospf you could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a >>> > 1:1 nat to a private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just >>> > not clear on your setup. >>> > >>> > Christian Palecek >>> > >>> > Network Administrator >>> > >>> > Cybernet Inc. >>> > >>> > Hamilton, MT >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -------- Original message -------- >>> > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > Date:12/20/2014 10:48 AM (GMT-07:00) >>> > To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]> >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask >>> > >>> > Scott I got block of 13 and I can go all the way of block of 254 >>> if I >>> > wanted to. >>> > >>> > Tim >>> > >>> > >>> > On 2014-12-20 12:21, Scott Reed wrote: >>> > > How many addresses do they give you? >>> > > What is the subnet mask you use on your connection to the >>> upstream? >>> > > >>> > > On 12/20/2014 12:07 PM, [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> Well the upstream provider have the static ip's scripted inside >>> the >>> > >> modem. So I don't think they are actually routing the ip's >>> > directly to >>> > >> me. >>> > >> >>> > >> So it looks like I'm going have go bat route setup if that is >>> > correct. >>> > >> >>> > >> Tim >>> > >> >>> > >> On 2014-12-20 10:59, Christian Palecek wrote: >>> > >>> I think you are going to have to use dst-nat as a 1:1 nat, >>> unless >>> > >>> they >>> > >>> actually are routing you ip's, then you would just route them >>> > like >>> > >>> you >>> > >>> would any subnet. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Christian Palecek >>> > >>> Network Administrator >>> > >>> Cybernet Inc. >>> > >>> Hamilton, MT >>> > >>> >>> > >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> > >>> From: T Maylone <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > >>> Date:12/20/2014 7:33 AM (GMT-07:00) >>> > >>> To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > >>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask >>> > >>> >>> > >>> example routing through two routers >>> > >>> >>> > >>> assume your public ip is 1.1.1.1 >>> > >>> assume your provider routes 1.1.1.1 to your router A ether >>> port 1 >>> > >>> assume there is a relationship between router a ether 2 >>> > 10.254.0.1/29 >>> > >>> [2] and router B ether 1 10.254.0.2 >>> > >>> assume there is a relationship between router b ether 2 >>> > 10.253.0.1/29 >>> > >>> [3] and router c ether 1 10.253.0.2 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> In router A >>> > >>> IP route 1.1.1.1 10.254.0.2 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> In router B >>> > >>> IP router 1.1.1.1 10.253.0.2 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Tim Reichhart >>> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> Guys >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> I am just wondering if I have multiple wan IP's on ether1 is >>> > an way >>> > >>>> to place it onto other ethernet interfaces? Also I am running >>> > ospf >>> > >>>> on my routers so lets say router A is the main core with wan >>> IP’s >>> > >>>> and router B needs an wan IP from router A for an internal IP >>> how >>> > >>>> would I route that? >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Tim >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users [1] >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Links: >>> > >>> ------ >>> > >>> [1] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > >>> [2] http://10.254.0.1/29 >>> > >>> [3] http://10.253.0.1/29 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> ----- >>> > >> No virus found in this message. >>> > >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >>> > >> Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date: >>> > >> 12/20/14 >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Scott Reed >>> > > Owner >>> > > NewWays Networking, LLC >>> > > Wireless Networking >>> > > Network Design, Installation and Administration >>> > > Mikrotik Advanced Certified >>> > > www.nwwnet.net <http://www.nwwnet.net> >>> > > (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239 >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > >>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > No virus found in this message. >>> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >>> > Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date: >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -RickG KyWiFi >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > -- -RickG KyWiFi
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
