Hey Tj

If I wanted to be spoon fed I would asked it long time ago so just better watch 
your saying…

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of TJ Trout
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 1:43 PM
To: Mikrotik Users
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask

 

Sounds like he wants to be spoon fed?

 

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Scott Reed <[email protected]> wrote:

Well put, Joe.
One think I would add, don't withhold information.  If you want list members to 
help, don't make us guess what you have, tell us as much of the configuration 
as you know.  You will get quicker, more concise answers that way.

On 12/22/2014 9:45 AM, Joe Miller wrote:

Tim,

 

It is not a matter of being rude. If you are working in this space 
(networking), it is implied that you already know how to subnet IP addresses. I 
have been watching this thread go on for a while now and I have to say that if 
you are this thin skinned, maybe you may want to find something else to do for 
a living.

 

You will find some users here harsh at times, and this is because you haven’t 
done your own research first. There is plenty of information on the web to 
teach you about IP’s and subnet’s. here is one I use a lot, 
http://www.aelius.com/njh/subnet_sheet.html it is a subnet cheat sheet. When I 
first got into this business, I bought a book called “Subnetting for Dummies” 
and I bought Dennis’ book. 

 

You will get folks here popping off when you tell them you have a /13 subnet 
when actually it is a /27. This in itself speaks volumes as to how much you 
understand about subnets. This is the reason for the reference material they 
gave you. This was not being rude, period.

 

The whole point on this is do your own research and then ask questions, not ask 
questions and then do the research. No one here is going to do the work for 
you. We will help you along the way but we will not carry the water for you. We 
all have companies to run and employees to deal with. 

 

I personally will be willing to help you, but you have better have done your 
research first. This is how 99% of us are. 

 

So, put your big boy pants on and get to work.

 

Joe Miller

www.dslbyair.com

www.facebook.com/dslbyair

228-831-8881

 

“I can explain it to you, I cannot understand it for you.”

 

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 5:15 AM

To: 'Mikrotik Users'
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask

 

Wow…. You all don’t have to be rude…..

 

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bryce Duchcherer
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 11:50 PM
To: Mikrotik Users
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask

 

“Networking All-In-One For Dummies”

http://www.amazon.ca/Networking-All---One-Dummies-Doug/dp/1118380983/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8
 
<http://www.amazon.ca/Networking-All---One-Dummies-Doug/dp/1118380983/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419223262&sr=8-1&keywords=networking+for+dummies>
 &qid=1419223262&sr=8-1&keywords=networking+for+dummies

 

Also, for people new to MikroTik Dennis Burgess’ book Learn RouterOS has lots 
of good information in it.

http://www.amazon.ca/Learn-RouterOS-Edition-Dennis-Burgess-ebook/dp/B005OY0JJY 

He also has video’s on his website that you can download from training sessions.

 

Greg Sowell has lots of videos on YouTube that cover many thinks in RouterOS – 
they are definitely worth checking out.

 

I highly recommend if you can, spend the money and go to training courses, they 
are worth every penny.

 

Bryce Duchcherer

NETAGO

[email protected]

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of RickG
Sent: December 21, 2014 7:02 PM
To: Mikrotik Users
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask

 

http://bit.ly/1ClPQ1f

 

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

A /13 provides 524,286 usable IPs (before further subnetting).

I think people in this thread need to find a "Routing for dummies" (no name 
calling intended) book or video. This is all networking 101 stuff that people 
either have completely wrong or are clueless about.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 


  _____  


From: "tim2" <[email protected]>
To: "Mikrotik Users" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 6:36:06 AM


Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask

You have a /13 or a /28 which provides 14 usable ip, s.  1 is for gateway and 
the other is your primary router.  To control your traffic your customer 
gateway is the IP on your router.  

 

 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Scott Reed 

Date:12/20/2014 3:30 PM (GMT-05:00) 

To: Mikrotik Users 

Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask 

 

The one they gave you is critical.  The fact that you did not use it is 
probably an indication of why are are needing help with this. The list 
is not the place to give a full IP routing tutorial, but you need to use 
the .240, which also a /28 and has 16 address, 14 of which can be used 
by devices.  The remainder of the 256 block space can be divided and 
used however you want.
So, assuming that your are using the first 16 addresses, you could put 8 
address somewhere on your network by putting a.b.c.17/29 on a router 
port.  That becomes the gateway address for devices that connect to that 
port.  In OSPF you will tell it to redistribute connected routes and you 
will put a.b.c.16/29 in the Network section.

On 12/20/2014 3:03 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
>
> Scott
>
> If you want the actual subnet the upstream provider gave me was 
> 255.255.255.240 but I put in 255.255.255.0
>
> Which I have block of /13 which only 12 useable ips since the 13^th 
> one is upstream provider gateway IP.
>
> Tim
>
> *From:*[email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Scott Reed
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 2:56 PM
> *To:* Mikrotik Users
> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
>
> Routing works by one device knowing the next device to send a packet 
> to.  So the upstream knows that all of you addresses get sent to the 
> one on your gateway.  The provider's devices don't care how the data 
> gets to the destination, just that it goes to your router.  Your OSPF 
> will tell your headend router how to get the data to the end point.
> So, to fully answer your question, you need to answer the one I have 
> asked you several times. What is the subnet mask our your headend 
> router connecting to the upstream?  Give us that and we can quit 
> surmising what you might do and give you a how to do it.
>
> Also, from one of your comments, you can tell OSPF whether or not to 
> propagate your static routers.
>
> On 12/20/2014 2:09 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
>
>     @ Scott
>     Addresses come in pPowers of 2, so you probably have 16 addresses
>     in the block. So, need to know what subnet mask you use to
>     connect.  If you are using a /29 or /30, the rest can be located
>     anywhere on the network. Let OSPF do the work.  If you are using
>     the /28 to connect, you will either need to get your provider to
>     change it or get the rest of the addresses so you can subnet them.
>
>     How many addresses do you want at the "remote" site?
>
>     Let's say you have a block of 16, a /28. You can have a block of
>     8, a /29, at the headend and connected to the provider.  Then you
>     can have 8 more somewhere else on the network.  As long as you put
>     the address in OSPF correctly, the 8 addresses from the second
>     half can be anywhere on your network and OSPF will get them routed
>
>     I don’t know if I can even spit up the block like how your saying
>     because I only have 1 gateway IP address from the upstream
>     provider unless there is something I don’t know about because one
>     mikrotik router (core) router is handling the ip’s then from there
>     its ospf over wireless ptp link to an other mikrotik router with
>     totally different internal IP address from router a haves.
>
>     @ Christian
>
>     So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route
>     the whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just
>     setting a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a.  Or if it
>     is ospf you could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a
>     1:1 nat to a private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just
>     not clear on your setup.
>
>     This is how I got the network currently setup:
>     modem ----: routerboard a (w/static wan IP’s w/ospf) then the link
>     is on ether is going for my ptp to other routerboard b (running
>     ospf also) on ether1 then I want ether 2-4 run to sectors etc.
>
>     So I need to figure out how to route the static wan ip’s over ospf
>     from routerboard a to b etc..
>
>     Tim
>
>     *From:*[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Christian
>     Palecek
>     *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 1:07 PM
>     *To:* Mikrotik Users
>     *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
>
>     So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route
>     the whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just
>     setting a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a.  Or if it
>     is ospf you could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a
>     1:1 nat to a private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just
>     not clear on your setup.
>
>     Christian Palecek
>
>     Network Administrator
>
>     Cybernet Inc.
>
>     Hamilton, MT
>
>
>
>     -------- Original message --------
>     From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Date:12/20/2014 10:48 AM (GMT-07:00)
>     To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
>
>     Scott I got block of 13 and I can go all the way of block of 254 if I
>     wanted to.
>
>     Tim
>
>
>     On 2014-12-20 12:21, Scott Reed wrote:
>     > How many addresses do they give you?
>     > What is the subnet mask you use on your connection to the upstream?
>     >
>     > On 12/20/2014 12:07 PM, [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>     >> Well the upstream provider have the static ip's scripted inside the
>     >> modem. So I don't think they are actually routing the ip's
>     directly to
>     >> me.
>     >>
>     >> So it looks like I'm going have go bat route setup if that is
>     correct.
>     >>
>     >> Tim
>     >>
>     >> On 2014-12-20 10:59, Christian Palecek wrote:
>     >>> I think you are going to have to use dst-nat as a 1:1 nat, unless
>     >>> they
>     >>> actually are routing you ip's, then you would just route them
>     like
>     >>> you
>     >>> would any subnet.
>     >>>
>     >>> Christian Palecek
>     >>> Network Administrator
>     >>> Cybernet Inc.
>     >>> Hamilton, MT
>     >>>
>     >>> -------- Original message --------
>     >>> From: T Maylone <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >>> Date:12/20/2014 7:33 AM (GMT-07:00)
>     >>> To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
>     >>>
>     >>> example routing through two routers
>     >>>
>     >>> assume your public ip is 1.1.1.1
>     >>> assume your provider routes 1.1.1.1 to your router A ether port 1
>     >>> assume there is a relationship between router a ether 2
>     10.254.0.1/29
>     >>> [2] and router B ether 1 10.254.0.2
>     >>> assume there is a relationship between router b ether 2
>     10.253.0.1/29
>     >>> [3] and router c ether 1 10.253.0.2
>     >>>
>     >>> In router A
>     >>> IP route 1.1.1.1 10.254.0.2
>     >>>
>     >>> In router B
>     >>> IP router 1.1.1.1 10.253.0.2
>     >>>
>     >>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Tim Reichhart
>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >>> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>>> Guys
>     >>>>
>     >>>> I am just wondering if I have multiple wan IP's on ether1 is
>     an way
>     >>>> to place it onto other ethernet interfaces? Also I am running
>     ospf
>     >>>> on my routers so lets say router A is the main core with wan IP’s
>     >>>> and router B needs an wan IP from router A for an internal IP how
>     >>>> would I route that?
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Tim
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>     >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users [1]
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> Links:
>     >>> ------
>     >>> [1] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>     >>> [2] http://10.254.0.1/29
>     >>> [3] http://10.253.0.1/29
>     >>>
>     >>> _______________________________________________
>     >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>     >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> -----
>     >> No virus found in this message.
>     >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>     >> Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date:
>     >> 12/20/14
>     >
>     > --
>     > Scott Reed
>     > Owner
>     > NewWays Networking, LLC
>     > Wireless Networking
>     > Network Design, Installation and Administration
>     > Mikrotik Advanced Certified
>     > www.nwwnet.net <http://www.nwwnet.net>
>     > (765) 855-1060 <tel:%28765%29%20855-1060>   (765) 439-4253  Toll-free 
> (855) 231-6239 <tel:%28855%29%20231-6239> 
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Mikrotik-users mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mikrotik-users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Mikrotik-users mailing list
>
>     [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
>
>
>     No virus found in this message.
>     Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>     Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date:

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

 


_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users





 

-- 

-RickG KyWiFi

 

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4257/8785 - Release Date: 12/22/14





-- 
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik Advanced Certified
www.nwwnet.net
(765) 855-1060 <tel:%28765%29%20855-1060>   (765) 439-4253 
<tel:%28765%29%20439-4253>   Toll-free (855) 231-6239 
<tel:%28855%29%20231-6239> 


_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to