The big difference for me is I have never heard of Tranzeo removing
threads from forums or changing wiki pages when there is a problem. It
seem to me that Damien and staff roll their sleeves up and take care of
the problem.
On the other hand I know of a couple of threads that have vanished and
only addressed quite some time later.
Quite honestly I would rather have a vendor that openly acknowledges
their warts and fixes them than one that covers them up until they are
fixed. If I know they are actively working on it I'll cut them some
slack, the other way around I am left trying to figure out if it is
really the vendor's issue, another vendor's issue, my issue or Murphey's
fault.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
I mentioned that. While it might not be correct when it comes to karma,
it is correct when you have a board and shareholders to contend with.
_I_ have a fiduciary responsibility to my investors and my customers but
(and I think Tranzeo did this):
"If we do the right thing all the time, the numbers will follow...."
-Isao Ike Yukawa --Kyocera's senior managing executive officer
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B73D8-4N44XRX-Y&_user=4337239&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=4337239&md5=1c2abf9792104d5a98d1f312bca5513a>
Randy Cosby wrote:
Throwing in my 2 cents:
Someone mentioned something about one of the parties having a fiduciary
duty to not help a competitor. That attitude, which I hope is not
prevailing in this and future instances, will only end up hurting both
parties.
An eye for eye only ends up making the whole world blind. - Ghandi
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
