On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to > the table for me to continue maintaining them. > > I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude of > configurations available at mingw-builds. Comparing download numbers they > have a much higher visibility, and e.g. their adoption by the Qt Project > speaks of their quality. They have succeeded in doing what I missed when I > decided to start building GCC, so my effort spent in doing that is now > wasted.
That's sad. I was using your builds from time to time, too. Perhaps you can document your build process in the project resources, e.g. place your scripts in the svn somewhere or something? > > I may dabble into getting Clang 3.3 to work on Windows, perhaps even with > libc++, but I am not promising anything. > > I'll still linger around here though, don't worry. > > All the best, > > Ruben -- O.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
