On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello Ruben,
>
> 2013/6/23 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
>> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
>>
>> I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude of
>> configurations available at mingw-builds. Comparing download numbers they
>> have a much higher visibility, and e.g. their adoption by the Qt Project
>> speaks of their quality. They have succeeded in doing what I missed when I
>> decided to start building GCC, so my effort spent in doing that is now
>> wasted.
>>
>> I may dabble into getting Clang 3.3 to work on Windows, perhaps even with
>> libc++, but I am not promising anything.
>>
>> I'll still linger around here though, don't worry.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Ruben
>
> First, I want to thank you for your hard work you've spent into
> providing your excellent toolchains over the last years.  I am sad to
> hear that you discontinue it, but I am lucky to hear that you will be
> still reading this ML.
>
> Indeed it would be great, if you could put your build-experience into
> some documentation/build-scripts in our Wiki/repository.  This
> information is for sure of much interest to our community.  Any work
> on that is mostly appreachiated.
>
> That you think that mingw-builds is doing a better job as you did is
> at least for our community a least one good news ... nevertheless is
> mingw-builds a different venture, and I am not sure if we should drop
> that easy our own toolchains.  I admit that as long as mingw-builds is
> well maintained, and build regular toolchains on sane-state of
> toolchain, it is ok, but as soon as this might not happen anymore we
> are getting in serious troubles.  I don't think we should let
> third-party ventures manage our work exclusive and not providing some
> base-knowledge and environment by ourself.

Very well said, and I second this. I hope Ruben reconsiders.

>
> Thanks for your work and all the best,
> Kai

--
O.S.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to