Hi all,

as some of you maybe know there's new player on OS market called
http://smartos.org . What's starting to be interesting is their "port"
of KVM to Solaris code base which is used as a kernel module.

Bryan Cantrill didn't talk much about licenses in his paper
http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/7/71/2011-forum-porting-to-smartos.pdf
No matter how much interesting it sounds, the question on licensing
was addressed vaguely (if at all) during the talk.  In a private chat
later, Bryan mentioned there's no violation at all, but here you can
find a little more discussion https://lwn.net/Articles/455008/

In NetBSD is eg. dtrace/zfs made as module. The question now is if
those ports are CDDL, GPL or BSD licensed. Probably there was not
similar case at court yet.

As I know CDDL parts are (for example as modules) in FreeBSD and
NetBSD and there were couple of threads on misc@ about porting
zfs/dtrace to OpenBSD as  well.

OpenBSD is really clear about its policy, but do you think that it's
really possible to port stuff this way  and made it available as
module without need for change of license or worrying about shark
suits?

Thx

PS: No flame at all. I just think that this situation can be
interesting regarding future because of mixing licenses in some of
systems which are not so strict about license policy

Reply via email to