On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:36:39 +0100 Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote: > > This should not be an issue (this is also my response to Rogier). > > Ext3 is nothing more than ext2 with extra journaling features > > enabled, > > So in particular, the ext3 inode structure > is precisely the ext2 inode structure?
I know the defaults for inodes on linux have to be changed with -I 128 these days to be compatible with OpenBSD. Also maybe it's just ext4 but I thought it was ext3 too that requires file carving rather than just recovering deleted files which would suggest greater differences?
